get_document_translation_by_batch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but '通过批次号查询翻译任务' merely implies a read-only lookup. It does not mention response shape, polling semantics, error behavior, or any side effects, so an agent cannot predict behavior beyond the basic verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence with no filler and the key lookup criterion is front-loaded. Its brevity sacrifices informational depth, but it is clean, scannable, and contains only meaningful words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the simple one-parameter schema, there is no output schema and no description of what the tool returns. Sibling tools with different purposes (status, result, list) make this ambiguity material, so the description is not complete enough for an agent to reliably select and interpret the call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% because batch_no is already documented as '批次号'. The description repeats that concept in '通过批次号' without adding format, example values, or clarification of where the batch number comes from, so it adds no real value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action ('查询' / query), the target resource ('翻译任务' / translation task), and the lookup key ('批次号' / batch number), so the tool's basic purpose is clear. However, it does not differentiate itself from sibling tools such as get_document_translation_status or get_document_translation_result, which also query translation-related information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool instead of related siblings like get_document_translation_status, get_document_translation_result, or list_document_translations. The one-line description provides no usage context, exclusions, or alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.