Skip to main content
Glama

merge_merge_request

Destructive

Merge a GitLab merge request. Control squashing, auto-merge on pipeline success, custom commit messages, and source branch removal.

Instructions

Merge a merge request

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
squashNoSquash commits into a single commit when merging
auto_mergeNoIf true, the merge request merges when the pipeline succeeds.
project_idYesProject ID or complete URL-encoded path to project
merge_request_iidNoThe IID of a merge request
merge_commit_messageNoCustom merge commit message
squash_commit_messageNoCustom squash commit message
should_remove_source_branchNoRemove source branch after merge
merge_when_pipeline_succeedsNoIf true, the merge request merges when the pipeline succeeds. Deprecated in GitLab 17.11. Use `auto_merge` instead.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only restates the obvious action and does not add behavioral details beyond the 'destructiveHint' annotation, such as what happens to the source branch or pipeline behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), but for a tool with 8 parameters and destructive effects, it is too brief to be informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is completely inadequate given the tool's complexity, destructive nature, and number of sibling tools. It lacks any mention of effects, return values, or conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Merge a merge request' clearly states the action and resource, but does not differentiate from similar tools like 'approve_merge_request' or 'update_merge_request'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to merge versus approve or update a merge request.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zereight/gitlab-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server