get_user
Retrieves GitLab user details using their user ID. Provides profile information for the specified user.
Instructions
Get user details by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user |
Retrieves GitLab user details using their user ID. Provides profile information for the specified user.
Get user details by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true; description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., no mention of response, permissions, or error states).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Low complexity tool with clear purpose; annotations cover safety; description is adequate though it could mention output structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and schema already describes 'user_id' as 'The ID of the user'; description does not add additional meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'user details by ID', clearly distinguishing from sibling like 'get_users' which suggests listing.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage for fetching a single user, but no explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives like 'get_users' or 'whoami'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zereight/gitlab-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server