get_user
Retrieves details of a GitLab user by their ID, including name, email, and permissions.
Instructions
Get user details by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user |
Retrieves details of a GitLab user by their ID, including name, email, and permissions.
Get user details by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | The ID of the user |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description's mention of 'Get' is consistent but adds no extra behavioral traits. No details on scope or limitations beyond the schema.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence that is front-loaded and to the point, with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is mostly complete. It could hint at return fields, but not required for this level of complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the user_id parameter already described. The description does not add meaning beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get) and resource (user details by ID), with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_users' which retrieves multiple users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'get_users' for listing). No exclusions or context provided for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zereight/gitlab-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server