Skip to main content
Glama
zer0-kr

security-framework-mcp

by zer0-kr

assess_stack

Read-onlyIdempotent

Assess your technology stack to receive relevant OWASP security guidelines, cheat sheets, and test cases for application security.

Instructions

Given a technology stack, recommend relevant OWASP security guidelines, cheat sheets, and test cases.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
stackYesTechnology stack description, e.g. 'React, Node.js, PostgreSQL, REST API'

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint; description adds no extra behavioral details beyond recommendation scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy, efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with one parameter, annotations, and likely output schema; description sufficient for core use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers parameter with description and example; description adds format clarification beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description specifies verb 'recommend' and resource 'OWASP security guidelines, cheat sheets, and test cases' distinct from siblings like get_cheatsheet or assess_mcp_security.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_cheatsheet for specific documents; lacks exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zer0-kr/security-framework-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server