Skip to main content
Glama
zenskar

Zenskar MCP Server

Official
by zenskar

listPlans

listPlans

Retrieve a paginated list of plans defining reusable contract structures. Filter by name, status, and page through results with a cursor.

Instructions

Retrieve a paginated list of plans that define reusable contract structures. Hits /plans — the same data the Zenskar app's Plans page reads.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cursorNoCursor for pagination.
limitNoMaximum number of plans to return per page.
name__ilikeNoCase-insensitive partial match for plan name.
statusNoFilter by plan status. Valid values: draft, active, archived.
__userContextNoInternal user context for multi-tenant authentication and approval workflow
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description bears full burden. Mentions pagination and endpoint, indicating it's a read operation. However, does not describe return structure, authorization requirements, or rate limits. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences with no wasted words. Front-loaded with action and resource, then context. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should compensate. States pagination and endpoint, but lacks details on response structure (fields returned), default limit, or sort order. Adequate for a simple list operation but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already documents parameters adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'retrieve a paginated list of plans' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings like createPlan and getPlanById by indicating it's a list operation. Also mentions the endpoint and app source, reinforcing purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage for listing plans, but no explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., getPlanById for single plan, createPlan for creation). No exclusions or when-not-to-use provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zenskar/mcp-zenskar'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server