Skip to main content
Glama
zenoengine

msbuild-mcp-server

by zenoengine
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
Python
Local

Server Quality Checklist

67%
Profile completionA complete profile improves this server's visibility in search results.

  • Latest release: v0.1.0

  • Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'build_msbuild_project' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive.

    Tool Count4/5

    A single tool for building MSBuild projects is slightly under-scoped but reasonable for a focused server; additional tools like clean or list properties could be added.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers the core build operation with good configuration options, but lacks related operations such as clean or property listing, which may cause dead ends for some workflows.

  • Average 3.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

    See the Tool Scores section below for per-tool breakdowns.

    • No community issues in the last 6 months
    • 0 commits in the last 12 weeks
    • Last stable release on
    • No critical vulnerability alerts
    • No high-severity vulnerability alerts
    • No code scanning findings
    • CI status not available

  • This repository is licensed under MIT License.

  • This repository includes a README.md file.

  • No tool usage detected in the last 30 days. Usage tracking helps demonstrate server value.

    Tip: use the "Try in Browser" feature on the server page to seed initial usage.

  • Add a glama.json file to provide metadata about your server.

  • If you are the author, simply .

    If the server belongs to an organization, first add glama.json to the root of your repository:

    {
  "$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/server.json",
  "maintainers": [
    "your-github-username"
  ]
}

    Then . Browse examples.

  • Add related servers to improve discoverability.

How to sync the server with GitHub?

Servers are automatically synced at least once per day, but you can also sync manually at any time to instantly update the server profile.

To manually sync the server, click the "Sync Server" button in the MCP server admin interface.

How is the quality score calculated?

The overall quality score combines two components: Tool Definition Quality (70%) and Server Coherence (30%).

Tool Definition Quality measures how well each tool describes itself to AI agents. Every tool is scored 1–5 across six dimensions: Purpose Clarity (25%), Usage Guidelines (20%), Behavioral Transparency (20%), Parameter Semantics (15%), Conciseness & Structure (10%), and Contextual Completeness (10%). The server-level definition quality score is calculated as 60% mean TDQS + 40% minimum TDQS, so a single poorly described tool pulls the score down.

Server Coherence evaluates how well the tools work together as a set, scoring four dimensions equally: Disambiguation (can agents tell tools apart?), Naming Consistency, Tool Count Appropriateness, and Completeness (are there gaps in the tool surface?).

Tiers are derived from the overall score: A (≥3.5), B (≥3.0), C (≥2.0), D (≥1.0), F (<1.0). B and above is considered passing.

Tool Scores

  • Behavior3/5

    Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

    The description discloses a key behavioral trait: dynamic location of MSBuild via vswhere. It also mentions return format (success or filtered error messages). However, it does not cover failure modes (e.g., when MSBuild not found), side effects, or authentication needs. With no annotations, more detail would improve transparency.

    Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

    Conciseness3/5

    Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

    The description is structured into sections (parameters, returns) which is helpful, but it is somewhat verbose. The opening sentence repeats the tool's action ('Build ... using MSBuild'). It could be tightened to front-load critical info without extra words.

    Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

    Completeness3/5

    Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

    The description covers tool purpose, parameters, and return format. However, it lacks context about error handling, environment dependencies (vswhere requirement), and when the tool might fail. Given no annotations and no output schema details, completeness is adequate but not thorough.

    Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

    Parameters4/5

    Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

    With 0% schema description coverage, the parameter list in the description provides essential meaning beyond the bare JSON schema. It explains each parameter's purpose (e.g., verbosity values, function of additional_args). However, it could be more precise about valid values for configuration and platform, and the default behaviors.

    Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

    Purpose5/5

    Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

    The description clearly states the tool builds MSBuild projects/solutions and lists supported file types (.sln, .csproj, .vcxproj). The verb 'build' is specific and the resource is well-defined, leaving no ambiguity about the tool's purpose.

    Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

    Usage Guidelines3/5

    Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

    The description provides basic usage guidance ('Use this tool to automate the build process') but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use conditions. There are no sibling tools, so no need for differentiation, but it does not mention prerequisites or limitations like installation of vswhere.

    Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

GitHub Badge

Glama performs regular codebase and documentation scans to:

  • Confirm that the MCP server is working as expected.
  • Confirm that there are no obvious security issues.
  • Evaluate tool definition quality.

Our badge communicates server capabilities, safety, and installation instructions.

Card Badge

msbuild-mcp-server MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Score Badge

msbuild-mcp-server MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zenoengine/msbuild-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server