ps_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint: true, but the description adds no further behavioral context. It does not explain what 'restore preset state' entails, what settings are affected, or any side effects, thus adding minimal value beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point, but its brevity sacrifices informativeness. It could be expanded with behavioral or parameter details while remaining efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive hint and the presence of an output schema, the description should provide more context about the preset behavior and return value. Currently, it is insufficient for the agent to fully understand the tool's operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain the two parameters (alias, params_json) at all. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate, leaving the agent without understanding what these optional parameters control.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool restores the power preset state, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from many sibling tools by the 'ps' prefix and 'preset' action, though it could be more detailed in differentiating from other preset tools like cmw_preset or mxa_preset.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ps_set_voltage or other preset tools. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for proper invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.