cmw_set_ul_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only a 'destructiveHint: false' annotation, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure but adds nothing beyond the obvious action. No side effects, state changes, or dependencies are mentioned, making it opaque for a configuration tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short line, which is concise and front-loaded. However, the brevity sacrifices essential information, making it less effective despite being non-verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (two opaque parameters, part of a large CMW suite), the description is utterly incomplete. It fails to explain how to set the uplink channel, what values are valid, or any required setup, making it unusable for an AI agent without additional knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the purpose or format of the two parameters ('alias' and 'params_json'). 'params_json' appears to accept a JSON string for additional settings, but no details are provided, leaving the agent without guidance on how to specify the uplink channel number.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description "Set uplink channel number" clearly states the action and resource. The tool name also includes 'ul_channel' which distinguishes it from its sibling 'cmw_set_dl_channel'. However, the description is minimal and in Chinese, which may reduce clarity for non-Chinese readers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'cmw_set_dl_channel' or other configuration tools. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., band must be set) or context for proper invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.