Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AT Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A professional MCP server for serial port communication, enabling AI assistants to list, connect, send/receive data, and manage serial connections with embedded systems, IoT devices, and hardware debugging hardware.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides comprehensive debugging capabilities for J-Link debuggers, enabling memory, flash, register, and RTT operations through AI assistants.
      34
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Serial communication and protocol analysis MCP server that gives AI coding assistants direct access to serial ports for reading, writing, decoding, and capturing embedded device output.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for simulating firmware on virtual microcontroller instances, allowing AI agents to upload, run, and read UART output from supported boards such as STM32 and Nordic.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI-assisted MCU and embedded firmware debugging. It connects to real hardware via debug probes, inspects CPU/memory/peripherals, manages Keil builds, and provides structured evidence for fault diagnosis.
      19
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control GDB debugging sessions, including breakpoint management, thread analysis, and variable inspection, using the GDB/MI protocol.
      22
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but at_auto_detect and at_list_ports both deal with port discovery and may cause confusion. at_batch_test and at_send_command are clearly differentiated by batch vs single command. Knowledge base tools are well-separated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools start with 'at_' prefix. Most follow verb_noun pattern (at_open_port, at_list_ports), but knowledge base tools use noun_verb (at_knowledge_add, at_knowledge_list), and at_configure is a standalone verb. Minor inconsistency but overall predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for the domain of AT command interaction and knowledge management. It covers port operations, command sending, and knowledge base without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflow is covered: port detection (auto_detect, list_ports), configuration (configure), open/close, and command sending (single/batch). Knowledge base adds support. Missing possibly a 'read current config' or raw send without AT prefix, but these are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues