Estadísticas de la DB

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It states that the tool returns a summary, but it does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is read-only, requires authentication, or has any side effects. The description is minimal in this regard.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with 'Resumen'. Every word is necessary and no extraneous information is present. It is efficiently structured for quick parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description only partially informs the agent. It states the content (games by section, post counts) but not the return format or structure. For a simple statistics tool, this may be sufficient, but it leaves some ambiguity about how the data is presented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, and the input schema is empty with 100% schema description coverage. The description does not need to add parameter semantics since there are none, and the baseline for zero parameters is 4. The description adequately implies no inputs are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: it provides a summary of total games by section and number of posts (published/drafts). This is a specific verb (summary) and resource (DB statistics), and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_blog_posts or list_releases which return item lists rather than aggregated statistics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given on when to use this tool versus siblings. The description implies it is for a high-level summary, but it does not mention when not to use it or provide alternatives. Thus, usage guidelines are only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.