Skip to main content
Glama

The problem

Agents increasingly need to pay for things: an API call, a dataset, a bounty, another agent. Today the choices are bad:

  • Hand the agent a private key. One prompt injection away from an empty wallet.

  • Hand it a card. No per-call limits, no allowlist, and your bank will not tell you which tool call spent the money.

  • Approve every payment by hand. Then it is not really an agent.

Veyra is the layer in between. You connect a wallet you already own, set what an agent may spend, and hand the agent one MCP endpoint. The agent gets tools like create_payment. It never sees a key, and it cannot exceed the limits you set because the limits are enforced by Veyra's server, not by the model following instructions.

  agent  ──MCP──▶  veyra.money  ──policy──▶  your wallet  ──USDC on Base──▶  recipient
                    │
                    ├─ under auto-max      → executes from your capped on-chain allowance
                    ├─ in the ask band     → you approve in your own wallet (one link)
                    └─ over the limits     → blocked, agent is told why

Related MCP server: Budget Governor

60-second setup

  1. Sign up at veyra.money, connect a wallet (or start with the simulated source, which moves no money).

  2. Create an MCP endpoint with limits. Copy the credential (it starts with veyra_).

  3. Add it to your host:

claude mcp add --transport http veyra https://veyra.money/api/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer veyra_..."
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veyra": {
      "url": "https://veyra.money/api/mcp",
      "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer veyra_..." }
    }
  }
}
export VEYRA_TOKEN=veyra_...
codex mcp add veyra --url https://veyra.money/api/mcp --bearer-token-env-var VEYRA_TOKEN
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "veyra": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "veyra-mcp"],
      "env": { "VEYRA_TOKEN": "veyra_..." }
    }
  }
}

The veyra-mcp binary is a stdio bridge: it holds the credential locally and relays every call to the hosted endpoint. No policy lives in the bridge.

curl -s https://veyra.money/api/mcp \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer veyra_..." \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"get_budget","arguments":{}}}'

Then ask the agent to do something that costs money and watch the policy decide.

Tools the agent gets

Tool

What it does

get_capabilities

Rails, networks, assets, limits and the recipient allowlist in force right now

get_budget

Daily limit, spent today, per-payment limit, auto and ask bands

list_payment_sources

Masked sources and whether each can settle without a human

create_payment

Create a payment intent. Policy is applied server-side and the result says what happened

get_payment

Canonical state for one payment, including which rail settled it

list_payments

Recent payments for this endpoint

cancel_payment

Cancel while still cancellable

Every payment reports one of these statuses:

Status

Meaning

confirmed

Value moved on-chain

confirmed_simulated

Settled on the simulated rail. No money moved. The agent is told this explicitly

awaiting_approval

In the ask band. next_action.url is a one-time link the owner opens in their own wallet

submitted

Transaction sent, waiting for the chain receipt

pending

Created, not yet evaluated or executed

failed / cancelled / expired

Terminal. Blocked-by-policy payments are failed with a policy_reason

Use it from code

npm install veyra-mcp
import { VeyraClient, VeyraToolError, idempotencyKey } from "veyra-mcp";

const veyra = new VeyraClient({ token: process.env.VEYRA_TOKEN! });

const budget = await veyra.getBudget();
console.log(`spent ${budget.spent_today} of ${budget.daily_limit} USDC today`);

try {
  const payment = await veyra.createPayment({
    amount: "1.25",
    recipient: "0x1234…abcd",          // USDC on Base
    reason: "Weather API, 500 calls",
    idempotency_key: idempotencyKey("weather"),
  });

  if (payment.status === "awaiting_approval") {
    console.log("Owner needs to approve:", payment.next_action?.url);
    const settled = await veyra.waitForPayment(payment.payment_id);
    console.log(settled.status);
  }
} catch (e) {
  if (e instanceof VeyraToolError) {
    // A deliberate refusal: policy, validation, allowlist, auth.
    console.log(e.code, e.message);   // e.g. "POLICY_BLOCKED …"
  } else throw e;
}

VEYRA_TOOLS exports the tool definitions as JSON Schema, so you can register them with the Vercel AI SDK, LangChain, or plain function calling without a network round-trip. See veyra-examples for complete agents built with the Claude Agent SDK and the Vercel AI SDK.

What you are trusting

Worth being blunt, because this is money.

  • Veyra never holds your funds. Payments go from your wallet to the recipient. There is no Veyra balance in the middle.

  • Above your auto-approve limit nothing is delegated. You sign each transfer in your own wallet from the approval link. Veyra verifies the on-chain receipt matches the request.

  • Within your auto-approve limit you grant a capped ERC-20 allowance to a relayer Veyra operates, the same approve primitive every DeFi app uses. The token contract enforces the cap. Veyra's policy engine decides the destination within that cap, so size the allowance like a float you could lose, and use the recipient allowlist when you know who the agent should be paying. Revoke it any time.

  • The simulated rail exists so you can wire everything up before touching real funds. It is labelled everywhere: status confirmed_simulated, simulated: true.

  • Every decision is in the audit log, including limit changes and credential rotations.

Full details: How a payment actually moves and What you are trusting, exactly.

FAQ

Which networks and assets? USDC on Base. One stablecoin keeps the dollar limits exact without a price feed, and Base is where the agent-payment ecosystem already settles. More rails are on the roadmap; open an issue if you need one.

Does this work with x402 or pay-per-call APIs? Yes, in the sense that matters: the agent asks Veyra to pay the seller's address and gets a receipt. Veyra is the spending policy, not the protocol on the other end.

Can I self-host? Not today. This repo is the client and bridge; the policy engine is the hosted service at veyra.money. The wallet-approval path is fully non-custodial regardless.

What does it cost? There is a free plan. See pricing.

Where do I report a bad policy decision? From the dashboard, so support can see your audit log. This repo's issues are for the client and bridge.

Development

npm install
npm test     # builds, then runs the suite against a local mock of the endpoint

See CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md.

MIT © Veyra

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Budget & cost control for AI agents: hard per-agent spend caps, rate limits, idempotency, and human-in-the-loop approval — enforced before each LLM call, not after the invoice. One hosted MCP endpoint (no proxy or self-hosting), settled via x402 (USDC on Base).
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for USDC payments on Base, enabling AI agents to check balances, send payments, generate payment requests, and view transaction history.
    4
    1
    MIT