Skip to main content
Glama
zagushka

Foundry REST API MCP

by zagushka

foundry_get_scenes

Read-only

Fetch Foundry scenes by ID, name, active status, or viewed flag to retrieve scene data for preparing worlds and encounters.

Instructions

Get one or more scenes.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
allNo
nameNo
activeNo
userIdNoOptional Foundry user ID or username for permission-scoped access.
viewedNo
sceneIdNo
clientIdNoFoundry client ID; defaults to FOUNDRY_CLIENT_ID.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral detail beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. It does not disclose what data is returned, what the 'all' or 'active' flags do, or any side effects. The agent must rely on the schema alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence and contains no wasted words. However, the brevity results in under-specification rather than effective conciseness, as it omits essential details about tool usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 7 optional parameters, the description is inadequate. It fails to explain what a scene is, how filtering works, or what the return structure looks like, making the tool incomplete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 29%, meaning most parameters lack descriptions. The tool description does not compensate by explaining how 'name', 'sceneId', 'viewed', or other parameters affect the query. It provides zero additional parameter clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly uses the verb 'Get' with the resource 'scenes', indicating a retrieval operation. However, it lacks differentiation from sibling tools like foundry_get_entity or foundry_get_canvas_documents, and does not define the scope of 'scenes'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, recommended scenarios, or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for selecting this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zagushka/foundry-rest-api-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server