arc_clear_storage

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'clear storage' implying a destructive operation, but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or what happens to other storage types. The phrase 'for reset during development' hints at intentional clearing but is insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point. It avoids unnecessary words while conveying the essential purpose. However, it could be slightly more informative within the same length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and a simple action, the description is minimal. It doesn't mention return values or success/failure signals. For a reset tool, users might expect confirmation. The description is too brief to be fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already documented. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description does not enhance understanding of the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool clears storage for development reset. It specifies the general purpose and context, distinguishing it from sibling tools like arc_clear_indexeddb which clears IndexedDB. However, it could explicitly mention the storage types (localStorage/sessionStorage) without relying on the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only mentions 'for reset during development', but does not exclude other scenarios or compare with similar tools like arc_clear_indexeddb or arc_remove_storage_item.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.