arc-browser-control
Related Servers
Alternatives to arc-browser-control
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Arc browser that enables programmatic management of spaces and tabs. It supports actions like listing, creating, and deleting spaces and tabs, as well as focusing spaces and opening URLs via AppleScript.99 npm6-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server to control Arc Browser on macOS, optimized for frontend development with 30 tools including DOM operations, debugging, and network monitoring.30-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to control and inspect Chrome/Arc browsers via DevTools, with Arc-specific tab reuse.11 npm1Apache 2.0

agentify-desktopofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI tools to control local browser sessions for ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI services, supporting querying, navigation, file uploads, and artifact management.28 npm558Mozilla Public 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that bridges AI agents and macOS, enabling automation of file navigation, application control, UI interaction, browser automation, and system operations.176MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables remote observation and control of a Chromium browser via a WebSocket relay, supporting DOM, CDP, and native OS automation for local or LAN-based AI agents.-
TDQS
Scored across 76 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource, with detailed descriptions that clearly differentiate them. Even similar tools like arc_get_page_content and arc_get_page_html are distinguished by their specific output (text vs. HTML).
All tools follow the consistent pattern 'arc_verb_noun' using imperative verbs and descriptive nouns. The naming is uniform across the entire set, making it easy to predict tool actions.
With 76 tools, the set is large but covers the extensive scope of browser automation. While some consolidation could be possible, the number is justified for a comprehensive browser control server, though it borders on excessive.
The tool surface covers most core browser automation tasks: navigation, interaction, storage, network, performance, and tab/window management. Minor gaps exist, such as missing scroll or element attribute tools, but agents can work around them.