Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cinch-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that enables AI assistants to execute code securely in isolated E2B sandboxes.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants and LLM applications to safely execute Python and JavaScript code snippets in containerized environments.
      2
      203
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Sandboxed bash execution MCP server for AI agents, using an in-memory virtual filesystem overlay to prevent real filesystem damage, with configurable network access, timeouts, and optional Python/JS runtimes.
      9
      19
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides secure code execution capabilities using AWS Bedrock AgentCore's CodeInterpreter, supporting Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, shell commands, and file operations.
      10
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs to run ANY code safely in isolated Docker containers.
      121
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure local MCP server that provides AI assistants controlled filesystem access and command execution with an interactive approval system for dangerous actions.
      17
      15
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with others. The tool's purpose is clearly stated, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'execute_code' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and accurately reflects its function. Consistency is trivially maintained.

    Tool Count4/5

    At one tool, the server is minimal but appropriate for its narrow purpose of code execution. It is not a trivial tool, and no additional tools seem necessary for the described sandbox functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The server fully covers its stated domain: executing Python and JavaScript in a sandbox. All necessary parameters and constraints are documented, and there are no obvious missing operations for this focused use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues