Solicitar presupuesto en Perfex CRM

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the mechanism (public form) and the required environment variables, but does not describe side effects, return behavior, or what happens after submission. This is a moderate amount of detail for a simple request tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the purpose and adds a necessary prerequisite, earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, but there is no output schema and the description does not explain what happens after submission or what the response indicates. It covers purpose and prerequisites but lacks post-condition details, making it incomplete for an agent relying solely on this description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of parameter descriptions, and the description does not add extra meaning to the parameters beyond what is already in the schema. The mention of PERFEX_URL and PERFEX_QUOTE_KEY refers to environment variables, not user-supplied parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Envía una solicitud de presupuesto') and the resource ('estimate request' via public form). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like create_lead and create_ticket by being quote-specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_lead or create_ticket. The description only mentions a prerequisite (PERFEX_URL and PERFEX_QUOTE_KEY) but does not explain the ideal use case or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.