Skip to main content
Glama
yunyminaya

perfex-crm-mcp

by yunyminaya

Related Servers

Alternatives to perfex-crm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that connects AI assistants to GoHighLevel CRM, enabling management of contacts, conversations, calendars, pipelines, payments, and more through 60+ tools.
      64
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that connects AI assistants to Kommo CRM (API v4), enabling real-time CRM actions such as creating/managing leads, tasks, notes, and more through 29 tools.
      29
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      High-performance MCP server providing direct MySQL access to Perfex CRM, enabling fast and secure management of customers, invoices, projects, and more via natural language.
      6 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that connects AI systems to GoHighLevel CRM, providing 269+ tools for contact management, messaging, calendar, sales, and automation.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server allowing an AI assistant to interact directly with your GLPI instance via its REST API, enabling ticket management, knowledge base operations, and statistics.
      40
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Invoice Ninja v5 API. Enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, quotes, payments, and time tracking through natural language.
      32
      19 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: lead creation, ticket creation, quote request, and health check. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools follow a 'create_<entity>' pattern, but 'request_quote' uses a different verb and 'perfex_health' is not verb-first. The naming is readable but not fully consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well within the ideal range for a focused CRM integration covering public form submissions and a health check. Each tool has a clear purpose and none are redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main public-facing actions (lead, ticket, quote) and a health check. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no contact creation or read operations), but the scope of public forms is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues