Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to file-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for filesystem operations, process management, interactive sessions, and async file search. Includes utilities for JSON repair, encoding fixes, duplicate detection, OCR, ZIP archives, and Markdown export.
      6
      46
      56
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A sandboxed file-access MCP server for Claude Desktop, enabling safe read/write access to selected directories with atomic verified writes, undo, and read-only git operations.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A tuned filesystem MCP server for Codex-style development, offering fast file operations, bounded output, and safe edits.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A durable, cross-platform development MCP server providing managed Git worktrees, bounded file operations, atomic writes, deterministic patches, and durable operation state. It gives MCP clients a reliable development control plane that survives restarts and enforces precise mutation contracts.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Stdio MCP server for sandboxed file access — read files, search content, safely edit with checksums, and manage file structure.
      12
      ISC

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: session management, various replace methods, and full file writing. No two tools appear to do the same thing, and descriptions clarify the differences.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., abort_write_session, replace_literal), making them predictable and easy to interpret.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well within the ideal range. Each tool addresses a specific file editing operation without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks basic file operations like reading, deleting, or listing files. While editing and writing are covered, the absence of read functionality creates a significant gap for typical file management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues