A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server providing browser compatibility data for the entire Web Platform.
7
333 npm
1
MIT
caniuse-mcp
by yujeongJeon
Related Servers
Alternatives to caniuse-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that queries the baseline status of web platform features using data from webstatus.dev. It provides tools to get feature baseline status and a summary of baseline categories.21-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables programmatic management and monitoring of development servers through a unified interface and interactive TUI. It provides tools for process control, log streaming, and experimental browser automation via Playwright.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA MCP server that provides browser automation tools, allowing users to navigate websites, take screenshots, click elements, fill forms, and execute JavaScript through Playwright.82Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing tools for web research, code review, and concept explanation, callable by any MCP-compatible client.3-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides browser automation with anti-detect fingerprinting, accessibility snapshots, and ref-based element targeting, powered by Camoufox.19MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation4/5
caniuse_feature and browserslist_compatibility_check both concern browser compatibility, but one is a general feature lookup while the other evaluates a browserslist configuration. list_tools is clearly a meta tool. The descriptions do enough to keep the two domain tools from being easily confused.
Naming Consistency3/5
list_tools follows a verb_noun pattern, while caniuse_feature and browserslist_compatibility_check are noun-like compound names rather than action-oriented commands. All names are snake_case, so the inconsistency is noticeable but not chaotic.
Tool Count4/5
Three tools is a reasonable size for a focused read-only compatibility server. list_tools is somewhat redundant as a meta tool, but it does not significantly harm the overall scope.
Completeness4/5
The core workflows of looking up a feature and checking against a browserslist configuration are covered. A search or listing tool for available caniuse feature names would make the set more complete, but agents can work around this if they know the feature slug.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues