browser_clear
Clears the content of an input field specified by a CSS selector.
Instructions
清空输入框的内容。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| selector | Yes | 输入框的 CSS 选择器 |
Clears the content of an input field specified by a CSS selector.
清空输入框的内容。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| selector | Yes | 输入框的 CSS 选择器 |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v0.5.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states the basic action. It does not disclose side effects (e.g., triggering events), error behavior for missing elements, or whether it affects disabled fields.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that directly conveys the tool's purpose without unnecessary words or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple action, the description is adequate, but it omits potential edge cases (e.g., clearing a non-input element, or the effect on related UI state). Still, it is sufficiently complete for the tool's simple nature.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the parameter 'selector' as a CSS selector, and the tool description adds no additional context or clarification about its usage or expected format.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: clearing the content of an input field. It uses a specific verb and resource, making it distinct from sibling tools like fill or click.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use fill with an empty string. Usage must be inferred from the tool's name and description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yubao2000/mcp-browser-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server