browser_batch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It mentions '按顺序执行' (execute in order), which is a key behavior, but it does not describe potential side effects, failure handling, or how the order affects the browser state. Additionally, the sentence '限时免费中' (limited time free) is irrelevant and distracts from behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes an irrelevant marketing phrase '限时免费中' (limited time free) that does not help the agent understand the tool. This extra content wastes space and violates the principle that every sentence should earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives concrete examples of operations (open web pages, click, fill, extract, wait) which helps the agent understand the range of actions. However, it does not explain the structure of the 'steps' parameter beyond what the schema already provides, nor does it mention edge cases like invalid actions. Given the schema richness, this is adequate but not exceptional.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage of the one parameter (steps) with a description of each property and the overall list. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already states, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: batch execution of automation operation sequences. It mentions the specific verb '批量执行' (batch execute) and the resource '自动化操作序列' (automation operation sequence), and it specifies that operations are executed in order. This distinguishes it from the individual sibling tools like browser_click or browser_fill.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus the individual sibling tools. It implies batch usage but does not state conditions like 'use this when you need to perform multiple steps' or 'use individual tools for single actions.' No alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.