Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dokimo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch and independently verify on-chain data such as account balances and contract code hashes using Merkle proofs and ECDSA signatures, with x402 payment integration.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.
      11
      47 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Verifiable action receipts for AI agents — agents sign claims locally, an independent witness countersigns and timestamps, anyone can verify offline.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Cryptographic verification for AI agent actions — ECDSA-secp256k1 signed Action Receipts anchored on Base, multi-dimensional trust vectors, capability tokens, and offline-verifiable on-chain proof. 29 tools.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to verify that an AI agent is who it claims to be by combining domain verification, agent-card checks, and a live MCP handshake, with paid requests handled via x402 on Base Sepolia testnet.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: recompute locally, verify against on-chain anchor, and fetch discovery metadata. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (recompute_, verify_, dokimo_agent_card), which is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its specific verification workflow. Each tool is necessary and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers local recompute, full verification, and discovery. The only minor gap is the lack of a tool to fetch or construct evidence packages, but that is outside the core verification workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues