get_organization_role

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Get information', implying a read-only operation, but does not specify details like authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or what information is returned. For a tool with no annotations, this is insufficient to inform the agent adequately about its behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the core purpose in a single sentence. The bracketed context '[Organization Management]' is concise and adds minimal overhead. There is no wasted text, making it efficient, though it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what information is returned, potential errors, or behavioral traits like idempotency. For a tool with no structured support, the description should provide more context to compensate, but it falls short, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with clear documentation for 'organizationId' and 'roleId'. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as format examples or relationships between parameters. Given the high schema coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema handles the parameter documentation adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool 'Get information about an organization role', which clearly indicates a read operation on a specific resource (organization role). However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_organization_member_info' or 'list_organization_roles', making it vague in comparison. The bracketed '[Organization Management]' adds some context but is not specific enough for full clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, such as needing specific permissions or when to choose this over similar tools like 'list_organization_roles'. This lack of explicit or implied usage context leaves the agent without direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.