Skip to main content
Glama
yhc984

Talk to Figma MCP

by yhc984

join_channel

Connect to a Figma channel for real-time communication and collaboration on design projects.

Instructions

Join a specific channel to communicate with Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
channelNoThe name of the channel to join

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for the 'join_channel' MCP tool. It validates the channel input, calls the joinChannel helper, and returns success or error messages.
    async ({ channel }) => {
      try {
        if (!channel) {
          // If no channel provided, ask the user for input
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: "Please provide a channel name to join:"
              }
            ],
            followUp: {
              tool: "join_channel",
              description: "Join the specified channel"
            }
          };
        }
    
        await joinChannel(channel);
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: "text",
              text: `Successfully joined channel: ${channel}`
            }
          ]
        };
      } catch (error) {
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: "text",
              text: `Error joining channel: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`
            }
          ]
        };
      }
    }
  • Zod schema defining the input parameter 'channel' for the join_channel tool.
    {
      channel: z.string().describe("The name of the channel to join").default("")
    },
  • Registration of the 'join_channel' tool using McpServer.tool method, including description, schema, and handler.
    server.tool(
      "join_channel",
      "Join a specific channel to communicate with Figma",
      {
        channel: z.string().describe("The name of the channel to join").default("")
      },
      async ({ channel }) => {
        try {
          if (!channel) {
            // If no channel provided, ask the user for input
            return {
              content: [
                {
                  type: "text",
                  text: "Please provide a channel name to join:"
                }
              ],
              followUp: {
                tool: "join_channel",
                description: "Join the specified channel"
              }
            };
          }
    
          await joinChannel(channel);
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Successfully joined channel: ${channel}`
              }
            ]
          };
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error joining channel: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`
              }
            ]
          };
        }
      }
    );
  • Helper function that sends the 'join' command to Figma via WebSocket and updates the current channel state.
    async function joinChannel(channelName: string): Promise<void> {
      if (!ws || ws.readyState !== WebSocket.OPEN) {
        throw new Error('Not connected to Figma');
      }
    
      try {
        await sendCommandToFigma('join', { channel: channelName });
        currentChannel = channelName;
        console.info(`Joined channel: ${channelName}`);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error(`Failed to join channel: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`);
        throw error;
      }
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('join') but doesn't explain what joining entails—whether it's a one-time action, if it requires specific permissions, what happens after joining, or any side effects. This leaves significant gaps in understanding the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded and efficiently conveys the essential information, earning a top score for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'join' means in this context, what the expected outcome is, or how this tool fits with the sibling design tools. For a tool with potential behavioral implications, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the single parameter 'channel' documented as 'The name of the channel to join'. The description doesn't add any additional meaning beyond this, such as examples or constraints, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage without compensating further.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('join') and resource ('a specific channel to communicate with Figma'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate this tool from its siblings, which are all Figma design manipulation tools, so it doesn't reach the highest score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites or context for joining a channel. Without annotations or explicit usage instructions, the agent must infer when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yhc984/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp-main'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server