Skip to main content
Glama
yhc984

Talk to Figma MCP

by yhc984

create_rectangle

Add a rectangle to Figma designs by specifying position and dimensions. This tool enables programmatic shape creation through the Talk to Figma MCP server.

Instructions

Create a new rectangle in Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
xYesX position
yYesY position
widthYesWidth of the rectangle
heightYesHeight of the rectangle
nameNoOptional name for the rectangle
parentIdNoOptional parent node ID to append the rectangle to

Implementation Reference

  • Core handler function that creates a rectangle in Figma using figma.createRectangle(), sets its position, dimensions, name, and appends it to a specified parent node or the current page.
    async function createRectangle(params) {
      const {
        x = 0,
        y = 0,
        width = 100,
        height = 100,
        name = "Rectangle",
        parentId,
      } = params || {};
    
      const rect = figma.createRectangle();
      rect.x = x;
      rect.y = y;
      rect.resize(width, height);
      rect.name = name;
    
      // If parentId is provided, append to that node, otherwise append to current page
      if (parentId) {
        const parentNode = await figma.getNodeByIdAsync(parentId);
        if (!parentNode) {
          throw new Error(`Parent node not found with ID: ${parentId}`);
        }
        if (!("appendChild" in parentNode)) {
          throw new Error(`Parent node does not support children: ${parentId}`);
        }
        parentNode.appendChild(rect);
      } else {
        figma.currentPage.appendChild(rect);
      }
    
      return {
        id: rect.id,
        name: rect.name,
        x: rect.x,
        y: rect.y,
        width: rect.width,
        height: rect.height,
        parentId: rect.parent ? rect.parent.id : undefined,
      };
    }
  • MCP tool registration for 'create_rectangle', including schema definition with Zod and proxy handler that forwards to Figma plugin via sendCommandToFigma.
    server.tool(
      "create_rectangle",
      "Create a new rectangle in Figma",
      {
        x: z.number().describe("X position"),
        y: z.number().describe("Y position"),
        width: z.number().describe("Width of the rectangle"),
        height: z.number().describe("Height of the rectangle"),
        name: z.string().optional().describe("Optional name for the rectangle"),
        parentId: z.string().optional().describe("Optional parent node ID to append the rectangle to")
      },
      async ({ x, y, width, height, name, parentId }) => {
        try {
          const result = await sendCommandToFigma('create_rectangle', {
            x, y, width, height, name: name || 'Rectangle', parentId
          });
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Created rectangle "${JSON.stringify(result)}"`
              }
            ]
          }
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error creating rectangle: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`
              }
            ]
          };
        }
      }
    );
  • Registration/dispatch of 'create_rectangle' command in the Figma plugin's handleCommand switch statement.
    case "create_rectangle":
      return await createRectangle(params);
  • Input schema for create_rectangle tool using Zod validation.
      x: z.number().describe("X position"),
      y: z.number().describe("Y position"),
      width: z.number().describe("Width of the rectangle"),
      height: z.number().describe("Height of the rectangle"),
      name: z.string().optional().describe("Optional name for the rectangle"),
      parentId: z.string().optional().describe("Optional parent node ID to append the rectangle to")
    },

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only repeats the basic action. It does not mention default parenting behavior, coordinate system, units, selection handling, or side effects beyond the creation itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and immediately communicates the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, this description is too minimal. It omits important context such as what happens when parentId is omitted, what coordinate space x/y refer to, and what the tool returns after creation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides descriptions for all 6 parameters, so the schema fully documents semantics. The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, making the baseline score of 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new rectangle in Figma' states a specific verb and resource, clearly identifying the operation. It does not explicitly contrast with sibling creation tools like create_frame or create_text, but the resource type is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not explain when to choose create_rectangle over alternatives such as create_frame or create_section, nor does it mention any preconditions or context in which this tool should be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.