VGCHelper
Related Servers
Alternatives to VGCHelper
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables live battle statistics queries and precise damage calculations for Pokemon Champions, supporting Japanese and English names, multiple formats, and environmental factors.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP-compliant server that enables AI agents to perform accurate Pokémon battle damage calculations using the Smogon calculator, supporting comprehensive input handling for Pokémon stats, moves, abilities, and field conditions.140 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Pokémon battle advising: provides type matchups, damage calculation, party analysis, and move/ability data for AI agents like Claude Code and Codex.22MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ChatGPT to retrieve live Pokémon data from PokéAPI, build tournament squads, and list popular tournament picks through MCP tools.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to build, analyze, and validate competitive Pokémon teams, including Pokémon Champions / VGC regulations.109607 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides accurate competitive Pokémon information for Pokémon Champions, including damage calculation, type effectiveness, Pokémon data, and regulation legality checks.101-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: status, meta refresh/query, replay analysis/retrieval/turn inspection/trends, team evaluation/detail, and damage calculation. There is no meaningful overlap among the tools even though several operate on replays or evaluations.
All tools share the vgc_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, but the verb/noun ordering is inconsistent: refresh_meta and meta_query flip the pattern, while replay_analyze, replay_get, team_evaluate, and damage_calculate place the object before the verb. The names remain readable, but the convention is not uniform.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for a VGC helper covering metagame data, replay coaching, team evaluation, and damage calculation. Each tool addresses a meaningful part of the workflow without unnecessary redundancy.
The tool surface covers the main lifecycle needs: refreshing and querying meta data, analyzing and retrieving replay coaching details, aggregating trends, evaluating teams, and calculating damage. Minor gaps exist, such as no listing or deletion of persisted replay reports/evaluations, but these are workable and do not break core workflows.