Retrieve editable local starter prompts for game-audio categories such as combat, footsteps, UI, and ambience, so you can customize sound-effect requests without contacting ElevenLabs.
Return editable local starter prompts for common game-audio categories. This is local guidance and does not contact ElevenLabs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden, and it does disclose the single most important behavioral trait: the tool is purely local, makes no network calls, and returns editable (not final) content. It does not cover whether the call is side-effect free by design or what the returned prompt objects contain, so it falls short of full disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with the core behavior front-loaded and the network-free caveat second. No filler or redundant restatement of the name.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple, zero-required-parameter lookup tool with no output schema, the description adequately conveys what comes back (editable starter prompts) and that no API is involved. The only meaningful gap is the optional-parameter default behavior, which matters because the schema leaves it undocumented.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the single optional 'category' parameter has no description in the schema, so the description should compensate more. It references 'game-audio categories' but never states what happens when category is omitted (all categories? a default?), and the ten enum values are only discoverable from the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description gives a specific verb ('Return') and resource ('editable local starter prompts') scoped to 'common game-audio categories', which is far more precise than the name alone. It also implicitly distinguishes itself from generate_sound_effect and the other generation siblings by stating it does not contact ElevenLabs, though it never names an alternative explicitly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The 'local guidance and does not contact ElevenLabs' clause implies this is a pre-generation starting point rather than a generator, which is useful context. However, there is no explicit when-to-use statement, no mention of what to do with the returned prompts, and no named alternative such as generate_sound_effect.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.