get_workspace_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full transparency burden. It communicates a read-only retrieval ('Return') and reveals the response shape as compact with teams/status counts, but it does not mention any caveats, permissions, or error behavior. This is minimal but not misleading for a simple getter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One focused sentence with no filler; the key information (what is returned and its shape) is front-loaded. Every word contributes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter retrieval with an output schema, the description conveys the essential scope and return shape. It could be more explicit about when to choose this over list_workspaces, but nothing critical is missing for calling it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for parameter meaning, but it does not mention workspace_id at all. The parameter name in the schema is self-explanatory, but the description adds no semantic value beyond the bare required field.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action ('Return'), a specific resource ('one compact workspace'), and the content included ('teams and status counts'). The singular 'one' clearly differentiates it from sibling list_workspaces, and the resource differs from other get_* detail tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. The singular 'one' and the resource name imply it is for retrieving a single workspace's detail rather than listing workspaces, but no alternatives or exclusions are named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.