Skip to main content
Glama
yanqiw

Coordination Memory MCP

by yanqiw
README.md
# Coordination Memory MCP

[![CI](https://github.com/yanqiw/comem/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/yanqiw/comem/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/coordination-memory-mcp.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/coordination-memory-mcp/)
[![Python](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.11%2B-blue.svg)](https://www.python.org/)
[![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.yanqiw/comem -->

Append-only **coordination memory** for multi-agent (and agent + human) work,
exposed as a local [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) (MCP)
server backed by SQLite — plus a local web management dashboard and goal-level
**acceptance contracts**.

It records *who owns which task*, run liveness, human interventions, handoff
evidence, and integrator review decisions. Only an **integrator** can promote work
into the accepted ledger, which you can export as a durable, auditable projection
(for example, committed into Git).

Design stance: the MCP is the **live coordination layer**; durable accepted truth
lives in whatever you project to. It is local-first (SQLite + stdio), and it never
deploys, never reads secrets, and never executes shell commands.

## Why

When several agents (or agents and people) push on the same body of work, two
things go wrong: they overwrite each other, and "I'm done" gets confused with
"this was accepted." Coordination Memory gives you:

- **Assignment claims with leases** so two actors don't clobber the same task.
- A hard distinction between an agent reporting `completed_gate_passed` and an
  integrator deciding `integrator_accepted`. Proposals are not truth.
- An **integrator-owned accepted projection** you review before archiving.
- **Acceptance contracts** that make "self-certified done" structurally
  impossible for goal-level outcomes (see below).
- A human-facing **Attention** view and latest **Resume Brief** so people can
  re-enter long-running work without turning summaries into agent recovery
  state or changing the coordination lifecycle.

Good fits: multiple agents on separate worktrees advancing one effort; needing a
review gate before something counts as accepted; wanting a replayable audit trail
of coordination decisions.

Not a fit: as your only long-term source of truth; as a place to store `.env`
files, tokens, passwords, or credential-bearing logs.

## Launch resources

- [90-second demo script](docs/demo-script.md) — a short walkthrough for showing
  leases, handoff evidence, integrator acceptance, and the dashboard.
- [Launch post draft](docs/launch-post.md) — copy for announcing the project
  without positioning it as generic memory or RAG.
- [OSS launch checklist](docs/oss-launch-checklist.md) — release, GitHub
  metadata, MCP Registry, and directory-submission steps.

## Install

Requires Python ≥ 3.11.

Install the single `comem` command with
[uv](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv) or pipx after the package is published to
PyPI:

```bash
uv tool install coordination-memory-mcp   # or: pipx install coordination-memory-mcp
comem --help
```

Or run it without installing (the package name and command differ, so pass
`--from`):

```bash
uvx --from coordination-memory-mcp comem --help
```

### From source

If the PyPI page is not live yet, or you want to run your own changes, install
the `comem` command straight from a checkout:

```bash
git clone https://github.com/yanqiw/comem
cd coordination-memory-mcp
uv tool install .                  # or: pipx install .
comem --version
```

This is a snapshot install — re-run it after editing the source to pick up
changes:

```bash
uv tool install . --reinstall              # rebuild from current source
uv tool install . --editable --reinstall   # or install editable: changes apply live
uv tool uninstall coordination-memory-mcp  # remove it
```

The command exposes four subcommands:

- `comem serve` — the stdio MCP server.
- `comem dashboard` — the local web management console.
- `comem init` — scaffold agent-onboarding files into a repo.
- `comem loop` — run the local-only scheduler for Codex agent conversations.

For local development, clone and `uv sync`, then prefix commands with `uv run`.

## Quickstart

### Run the MCP server

```bash
comem serve
```

This starts a stdio MCP server (normally launched by an MCP client). It opens no
HTTP port and prints no interactive CLI.

The database defaults to `./.coordination-memory/coordination.sqlite3`. Override
it with `COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB`. When several agents/worktrees collaborate, point
**all** of them at one absolute path **outside** every worktree, or each worktree
gets its own SQLite copy and the shared memory forks:

```bash
COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB=/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3 \
  comem serve
```

Do not commit the SQLite database to Git.

### Configure an MCP client

Client config locations differ, but with the command installed the server entry
should look like:

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "coordination-memory": {
      "command": "comem",
      "args": ["serve"],
      "env": {
        "COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB": "/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3"
      }
    }
  }
}
```

### Set up your agent

`comem init` scaffolds onboarding files so your coding agents know
the protocol, then prints this MCP config snippet:

```bash
comem init            # all tools, current directory
comem init --tools claude,cursor --dir ./my-repo
```

It writes a canonical **Coordination Memory protocol** section into `AGENTS.md`
(idempotently, between markers) and thin per-tool adapters that point to it:

| Tool | File written |
| --- | --- |
| Codex, OpenCode | `AGENTS.md` (read directly) |
| Claude Code | `.claude/skills/coordination-memory/SKILL.md` |
| Cursor | `.cursor/rules/coordination-memory.mdc` |
| GitHub Copilot | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` |

Re-running `init` updates the `AGENTS.md` section in place (no duplication).
Edit the protocol once in `AGENTS.md`; the adapters defer to it.

## Local loop

`comem loop` is the local-only scheduler for first-class Codex agent
conversations. The initial release supports `--adapter fake` for deterministic
testing and a guarded `--adapter codex-app-server` capability probe for future
local Codex app-server integration.

When Codex creates a workspace, team, and assignments for a plan, ask the user
to choose one execution mode before starting work:

- `codex_subagent` (default): the current Codex conversation remains the
  Integrator, starts Codex subagents as workers, and records claims,
  heartbeats, handoffs, and reviews in Coordination Memory.
- `comem_loop`: Codex starts `comem loop` with the selected workspace/team and
  the loop owns worker claims and thread starts.

Use `codex_subagent` for the smoothest Codex experience. Use `comem_loop` when
worker conversations must be independently resumable or scheduler-owned.

Dry-run scheduling:

```bash
COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB=/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3 \
  comem loop --workspace <workspace_id> --team <team_id> --adapter fake --dry-run --once
```

Fake local dispatch:

```bash
COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB=/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3 \
  comem loop --workspace <workspace_id> --team <team_id> --adapter fake --once
COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB=/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3 \
  comem loop --workspace <workspace_id> --team <team_id> --adapter fake --poll-interval 30
```

Loop-managed assignments should carry `metadata.session_bind.target_actor_id`
so the scheduler knows the intended worker before any run exists. The actual
Codex thread binding is recorded on the run after claim/start. Project design
and plan context must remain in Markdown files; assignments should reference
those files through metadata `context_refs`.

## Concepts

The store is six core tables:

- **workspace → team → assignment → run → event**, plus **actors**.
- An **assignment** is a unit of work. Claiming one starts a **run** and takes a
  lease. **Events** are the append-only log (evidence, handoffs, reviews, …).
- Actors act in a **role**: `integrator`, `agent`, or `human`.
- Mutating writes use **optimistic concurrency**: each carries the current
  `base_revision` and bumps the revision.

Event statuses an **agent** may submit: `proposed`, `observed`,
`completed_gate_passed`, `completed_gate_failed`. Decision statuses are
**integrator-only**: `integrator_accepted`, `integrator_rejected`, `needs_fix`.
`completed_gate_passed` is *not* accepted truth — only an integrator review
decision produces accepted state.

## Tools

**Coordination**

| Tool | Role | Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `register_actor` | any | register/refresh an actor profile |
| `register_workspace` | any | create/refresh a workspace record (idempotent) |
| `create_team` | any | create/refresh a team (auto-creates its workspace) |
| `create_assignment` | integrator | create a task (optional workspace/team/paths/criteria) |
| `cancel_assignment` / `supersede_assignment` | integrator | void / retire a task (releases any lease) |
| `claim_assignment` | agent | claim a lease; records run/session/worktree metadata |
| `heartbeat_run` | agent | report run liveness |
| `checkpoint_run` | agent | refresh the human-only latest Brief without changing run status |
| `raise_attention` | agent | write yellow/green non-blocking Attention; green resolves a dedupe key |
| `request_intervention` / `respond_intervention` | agent / human | use the red/blocking path, optionally with a Decision Packet, and move a run to/from an awaiting-human lane |
| `append_event` / `submit_handoff` | agent | append evidence / submit a reviewable handoff |
| `list_pending_reviews` | any | reviewable events with no decision yet |
| `review_event` / `accept_event` / `reject_event` | integrator | record a review decision |
| `get_team_board` / `get_assignment_detail` / `get_run_detail` | any | coordination read models |
| `get_human_brief` / `get_attention_board` | any | reconstruct latest human projections from the event ledger |
| `get_snapshot` / `export_git_projection` | integrator | accepted projection (see below) |

**Acceptance contracts**

`create_acceptance_contract`, `add_invariant`, `raise_deviation`,
`bind_assignment_to_contract`, `seal_contract`, `report_verification`,
`evaluate_contract`, `accept_contract`, `reject_contract`, `waive_deviation`,
`reopen_contract`, `get_contract_detail`, `list_contracts`.

Mutating tools take a `base_revision` and reject stale writes. Run/intervention
tools only change local lanes and the event timeline; they never execute commands,
resume threads, or touch files.

### Human Brief and Attention

Use `checkpoint_run` to refresh the human-only latest Brief without changing the
run status. Use `raise_attention` for non-blocking yellow/green updates; a green
update resolves the matching `dedupe_key`. Use `request_intervention` for the
red/blocking path when execution must wait for a person; it may include a
structured `decision_packet`. Read the latest ledger-derived views with
`get_human_brief` and `get_attention_board`:

```text
get_human_brief({"run_id": "run_123"})
get_attention_board({"team_id": "default", "target": "human", "include_green": false})
```

See [the tool reference](docs/tools.md#human-brief-and-attention) for complete
write examples and Decision Packet semantics.

## Acceptance contracts (goal-level governance)

An **acceptance contract** is a first-class object that sits above assignments and
defines machine-checkable, non-self-certifiable acceptance criteria for a
**goal-level outcome**. It is a structural protection layer whose purpose is to make
"the implementer declares it done" impossible.

### Data model

| Table | Role |
| --- | --- |
| `acceptance_contracts` | the contract: `goal_statement`, `status` (state machine), `revision` (optimistic concurrency), `acceptor_actor_id` (independent acceptor), `max_repair_attempts`/`repair_attempt` (loop bounds), `last_failing_keys_json` (no-progress brake) |
| `contract_invariants` | one machine-checkable predicate per row: `probe_kind` (`command`/`http`/`sql`/`file_assert`/`artifact_present`), `probe_spec_json` (references only — no secrets), `is_negative` (a deny test), `is_second_instance` (a second-tenant/second-instance test). Frozen after seal. |
| `contract_verifications` | append-only probe results: `outcome` (`passed`/`failed`/`error`), `evidence_json` (log path / commit / response hash — references only). "Pass or not" is decided by the latest probe result; a runner cannot mark a predicate passed by fiat. |
| `contract_deviations` | a deviation/shortcut register: `disposition` is **required** (`acceptable_forever`/`acceptable_this_phase`/`blocker`). While any `blocker` is `open`, the contract cannot reach `accepted`. |

### Three gates

1. **`seal_contract`** (`drafting → criteria_sealed`) — refuses to seal unless there
   is at least one deny test, at least one second-instance test, every invariant
   has a probe spec, and the bound acceptor is **not** an actor that ran a bound
   assignment. Invariants freeze after seal; the only way to change them is
   `reopen_contract` (a loud reset that clears the seal and prior probe results).
2. **`evaluate_contract`** — the objective gate and self-healing loop driver. It
   needs no acceptor, so the loop self-drives. If every required invariant's latest
   result is `passed` and no blocker is open → `awaiting_acceptor`. Otherwise it
   bumps the attempt and emits a bound repair assignment for an external
   scheduler/runner to pick up; bounded by `max_repair_attempts` and a no-progress
   brake (failing set must strictly shrink), after which it escalates to
   `awaiting_human`. A bound runner cannot call `evaluate`/`accept` on its own
   contract.
3. **`accept_contract`** (`awaiting_acceptor → accepted`) — only the independent
   acceptor may sign off, certifying the invariant *set* adequately covers the
   goal (green is already objective fact). `reject_contract` sends it to
   `awaiting_human`.

```
drafting ──seal──▶ criteria_sealed ──(report_verification)──▶ verifying
                                                                  │
                                                          evaluate (objective gate)
                                    ┌─────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────┐
                             all required green             some failed / open blocker
                             AND no open blocker                       │
                                    │                       enter repair loop (bounded)
                            awaiting_acceptor                          │
                                    │                         repair_attempt > max OR
                              accept / reject                   no-progress → awaiting_human
                                    │
                             accepted / awaiting_human
```

The gate logic lives entirely in the store layer (`store.py`) — there is no prompt
or client that can bypass it.

## Dashboard (local management console)

A local, single-page management dashboard over the same SQLite memory. A small
stdlib HTTP server serves the Svelte/Vite-built static SPA plus JSON APIs. Read
APIs open the DB with `mode=ro` + `query_only` and fail rather than creating a
missing DB. The only write action is **Archive workspace**, which soft-updates
`workspaces.status` to `archived` through
`POST /api/workspaces/<id>/archive`; it never deletes tasks, runs shell, deploys,
or pushes.

```bash
COORDINATION_MEMORY_DB=/absolute/path/coordination.sqlite3 \
  comem dashboard --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765
```

![Assignment detail in the dashboard](docs/images/dashboard-assignment.png)

Open `http://127.0.0.1:8765/`. The **Overview** starts with Human Attention:
red items require intervention now, yellow items are safe to digest later, and
resolved green items stay collapsed into the count. The assignment lifecycle
board remains directly below it. The console also includes an Acceptance
Contracts section, a **Workspaces** management page, workspace detail pages,
and drill-downs for a contract, assignment, or run. Assignment and run pages
show the latest Human Resume Brief when one exists, followed by the existing
evidence and event detail. A team switcher and a 5s auto-refresh (overview only,
paused while you select text or the tab is hidden) live in the header, and the
header shows a build hash so you can tell when the UI changed. The same data is
available as JSON:
`/api/workspaces`, `/api/workspaces/<id>`, `POST /api/workspaces/<id>/archive`,
`/api/board`, `/api/governance`, `/api/contracts` (+ `/api/contracts/<id>`),
`/api/assignments/<id>`, `/api/runs/<id>`, `/api/runs/<id>/brief`,
`/api/attention` (with `team_id`, `target`, and `include_green=true|false`),
`/api/teams`, `/api/reviews`, `/api/version`.

## Accepted projection (export)

`get_snapshot` returns the accepted read model derived from the store — only events
an integrator accepted. `export_git_projection` writes (integrator-only) to a
directory you choose:

```json
{ "output_dir": "/tmp/coordination-projection", "actor_role": "integrator" }
```

produces:

```text
/tmp/coordination-projection/coordination-memory/snapshots/accepted-state.json
/tmp/coordination-projection/coordination-memory/events/accepted-events.md
```

Review the export before committing it anywhere. The tool writes only to the
directory you pass; it never overwrites other files.

## Security boundaries

- Does not read or commit `.env` files; does not store secrets, tokens, passwords,
  or private keys. Contract `probe_spec`, verification `evidence`, and all metadata
  hold **references only** (paths, commits, hashes).
- Does not execute deployments, shell commands, or version-control pushes. The
  acceptance-contract repair loop only emits an assignment record; execution stays
  in your own (externally authorized) scheduler/runner.
- Dashboard read APIs are read-only. The dashboard's only write action is
  **Archive workspace**, a soft workspace status update; it does not delete data,
  execute commands, deploy, or push.

## Development

```bash
uv sync
uv run pytest -q
uv run ruff check src tests        # lint
uv run ruff format --check src tests
uv run mypy src                    # type check
uv run pre-commit install          # optional: run lint/format on commit
npm test                           # frontend unit tests
npm run build                      # rebuild Svelte dashboard static assets
```

More docs: [docs/](docs/) (quickstart, concepts/governance, tool reference,
examples). See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) for the invariants a change
must preserve, and [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) for release notes.

## License

[MIT](LICENSE).

TDQS

C2.8/5.0

Scored across 42 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most operations target distinct entities and lifecycle stages, and descriptions are generally explicit. However, accept_event/reject_event sit alongside the more general review_event, and cancel_assignment/supersede_assignment plus record_run_binding/append_event/submit_handoff create overlapping clusters that could cause misselection in a 42-tool surface.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names are uniformly snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun shape (list_workspaces, create_assignment, seal_contract), which is easy to scan. Minor inconsistencies such as register_actor/register_workspace vs create_team, and noun-verb exceptions like heartbeat_run/checkpoint_run, keep it from being fully consistent.

Tool Count2/5

Forty-two tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold and makes the surface heavy for an agent to navigate, even for a complex coordination domain. Several near-duplicate decision/event tools could be consolidated or grouped into sub-servers without losing capability.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the core coordination lifecycle well: registration, assignment claiming, run heartbeats, interventions, event review, contract creation/sealing/evaluation, verification, snapshots, and export. Missing direct reads for actors/teams and absence of unarchive/delete operations are minor gaps, but most workflows don't hit dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues