Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-personal

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A modular MCP server built with Python and FastMCP, providing tools, prompts, and resources, plus a reusable async client for external API integrations.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A high-performance personal Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the FastMCP Python framework.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight local MCP server built with FastMCP for exposing custom tools to MCP-compatible clients. Enables local development and testing of MCP tools and resources.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server built with FastMCP that features dynamic tool loading and modular management via a dedicated tool directory. It supports both stdio and HTTP transport modes, enabling efficient development and deployment of custom MCP tools.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server built with FastMCP framework that provides example tools including message echoing and server information retrieval. Supports both stdio and HTTP transports for integration with various MCP clients.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A basic MCP server built with FastMCP framework that provides example tools including message echoing and server information retrieval. Supports both stdio and HTTP transports with Docker deployment capabilities.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The eight actual tools have distinct purposes: connectivity/test, arXiv search, PDF text preview, dataset stats, project scaffolding, report generation, and file-tree listing. ping and echo are both test helpers but differ clearly (link check vs parameter passthrough), so an agent is unlikely to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is a mix of bare verbs (ping, echo), verb+object (scaffold_project), object+verb (pdf_extract), and noun compounds (paper_search, project_tree, course_report). All names are lowercase, but there is no consistent verb_noun or action-oriented convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is comfortably within the ideal range for a personal MCP server, and each tool provides a genuinely different capability. None feel like padding, and the count is not overwhelming for an agent to choose from.

    Completeness4/5

    For the inferred domain of research/development personal utilities, the advertised workflows are largely covered: search then extract papers, inspect datasets, scaffold a project, generate a report, and view a file tree. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dataset sample-row preview or paper metadata fetch by ID), but they are workable and not severe dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues