mobile-mcp-allinone
Related Servers
Alternatives to mobile-mcp-allinone
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-driven mobile test automation through planning, generation, and self-healing agents for Android and iOS, exposed as callable MCP tools.9-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMobile automation suite of tools including an MCP and libraries for test authoring & execution. Android first, iOS support coming.383 npm80Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Android UI automation tools via MCP, enabling device interaction, UI snapshot, and gesture recording.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-driven phone management for Android and iOS devices, including flashing, unlocking, and automation via MCP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for cross-platform mobile automation (iOS/Android) using accessibility trees and screenshots, enabling agents to interact with apps on simulators, emulators, and physical devices.7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Appium mobile automation capabilities to Claude and other MCP-compatible clients, enabling cross-platform iOS and Android automation, element interaction, and session management.416 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Most tools divide into clear mobile, webview, and flow groups, but run_flow's op list overlaps with many individual tools (launch_app, screenshot, webview_connect, tap_text), and there are three screenshot-related tools (mobile_take_screenshot, mobile_save_screenshot, webview_screenshot). Descriptions clarify some boundaries, but an agent could easily select a single-step run_flow or the wrong screenshot tool.
Snake_case verb_noun naming is used throughout, with clear mobile_ and webview_ prefixes plus flow verbs. Minor inconsistencies exist: the webview group lacks the mobile_ prefix, coordinate suffixes vary (click_on_screen_at_coordinates vs double_tap_on_screen vs long_press_on_screen_at_coordinates), and run_flow/save_flow/list_flows form a separate prefix family.
With 35 tools, this exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many' even for an all-in-one mobile/webview/flow server. Several tools could be consolidated, such as the screenshot variants and the overlap between run_flow's op set and individual action tools.
App lifecycle, device interactions, screenshots, and webview inspection are broadly covered. However, flows can be saved, listed, and run but not deleted or updated, and some run_flow operations (wait, tap_text, assert_route) have no standalone equivalents, forcing workarounds. These are notable gaps but not fatal.