Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-apollo-config

mcp-apollo-config

by xsg22
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

apollo_get_namespace_configs

Retrieve all configuration items from a specified namespace, environment, and cluster in Apollo Config Center.

Instructions

Query all configs under a namespace/environment/cluster in Apollo.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "apollo_get_namespace_configs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
appIdNo
envNo
clusterNameNo
namespaceNameNo
pageSizeNo
maxItemsNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.2

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full disclosure burden. It only states 'query', but does not disclose read-only nature, potential side effects, pagination behavior, or response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it sacrifices completeness. While no word is wasted, the lack of detail makes it only adequate for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description omits crucial usage details: no parameter explanations, no mention of pagination or defaults, and no behavioral context. Incomplete for a tool with 6 optional parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain parameters. It does not mention any of the 6 parameters (appId, env, clusterName, namespaceName, pageSize, maxItems) beyond their names in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Query') and resource ('all configs under a namespace/environment/cluster'), and implicitly distinguishes from the sibling 'apollo_get_key' which likely targets a single key.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for querying all configs in a namespace, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use versus when not to, nor does it mention alternatives or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools