Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-apollo-config

mcp-apollo-config

by xsg22
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

apollo_get_key

Retrieve a specific configuration key value from an Apollo namespace, environment, or cluster.

Instructions

Query a single key in a namespace/environment/cluster in Apollo.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "key": "<key>"
    },
    "name": "apollo_get_key"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyYes
appIdNo
envNo
clusterNameNo
namespaceNameNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.2

TDQS

C2.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full behavioral burden. It merely says 'Query,' implying read-only, but lacks explicit safety info, error cases, or side effects. Minimal disclosure for a tool with 5 parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the main action. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity, making it less helpful than a slightly longer but more informative version.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters (1 required) and an output schema, the description is too sparse. It does not provide context on default values, optional parameters, or how the output schema relates to the query.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It mentions key and namespace/environment/cluster but does not explain the role of appId, env, clusterName, namespaceName, or how they scope the query. Insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool queries a single key in Apollo, specifying the hierarchical context (namespace/environment/cluster). It effectively distinguishes from the sibling tool apollo_get_namespace_configs which presumably retrieves all keys.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling or alternatives. The description does not explain prerequisites or scenarios where this tool is preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools