Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to moonlighting-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables a language model to see and act in the operator's own Chromium-based browser session through the Chrome DevTools Protocol, using the same screenshots and accessibility tree while keeping credentials encrypted and requiring human confirmation for payments, irreversible deletions, and secret changes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive a real headful Chrome browser using vision-first computer interactions, with support for multi-agent tab groups, password-manager-filled logins, and human handoff.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive a real Chromium browser by receiving compact, token-efficient page maps and only the changes after each action. It guards against hidden prompt injections, blocks payments, sends and deletions until the user approves, and lets agents learn site-specific notes over time.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local AI agents on macOS to drive the user's own signed-in Chrome through their own isolated tabs, with per-client tokens, blocked site categories, masked secrets and human hand-offs. Agents can open and navigate tabs, read pages, send real clicks and typing, inspect network requests, and hand tabs back to the user, all without touching other tabs or stealing focus.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct browser action (navigate, click, type, hover, drag, screenshot), and paired tools like browser_network_requests/browser_network_request and browser_snapshot/browser_find are clearly differentiated by description. However, some boundaries blur: browser_evaluate vs browser_run_code_unsafe both execute JS, and browser_drop vs browser_drag both involve drag semantics, which could cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a consistent snake_case browser_<verb|noun> pattern (browser_navigate, browser_click, browser_take_screenshot, browser_network_requests) with predictable prefixes. The only deviation is the two cred_* tools, which use a different domain prefix but still keep the same verb_noun style, so it remains readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 27 tools the set sits above the 25-tool 'heavy' threshold, and a few pairs (network_requests/network_request, evaluate/run_code_unsafe) could be consolidated. Still, browser automation is a genuinely broad domain where most tools earn their place, so it is heavy rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full browser lifecycle: navigation, element interaction, forms, tabs, dialogs, file upload, network/console inspection, snapshots, screenshots, media emulation, and credential filling. Minor gaps exist (no explicit cookie/storage-state management or download handling), but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues