Skip to main content
Glama
xiaobenyang-com

rfc-server

by xiaobenyang-com
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to rfc-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RFC MCP Server

      mjpitz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables programmatic access to IETF RFC documents, allowing users to fetch, search, and extract specific sections from RFCs.
      3
      35 npm
      20
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-rfc-editor

      daedalus
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for creating, loading, and editing RFC TXT documents using the rfc-editor Python library. It provides a suite of tools to manage document components including sections, abstracts, titles, and author metadata.
      29
      -

    • MCP-Server-IETF

      tizee
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to search and access IETF RFC documents with pagination support.
      3
      13
      MIT

    • kiwix-mcp

      OscillateLabsLLC
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables interaction with Kiwix HTTP servers to browse, search, and retrieve content from offline ZIM books like Wikipedia. It provides tools for listing available library resources and fetching full-text articles as plain text.
      3
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_rfc retrieves entire documents, get_rfc_section extracts specific sections, and search_rfcs finds documents by keyword. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (get_rfc, get_rfc_section, search_rfcs). The naming is predictable and readable, using clear verbs like 'get' and 'search' that accurately describe the actions.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools are reasonable for an RFC-focused server, covering core operations of fetching, sectioning, and searching. It is slightly lean but well-scoped; adding tools like list_rfcs or filter by date could enhance it, but the current set is functional.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers essential RFC operations: retrieval, section access, and search. Minor gaps exist, such as no listing or filtering capabilities (e.g., by status or date), but agents can work around this using search. For the domain, it provides a solid foundation without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources