remove_doc
Delete a document from a SiYuan notebook by providing the notebook ID and document path.
Instructions
按路径删除文档
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | 文档路径 | |
| notebook | Yes | 思源块、文档、笔记本或数据库 ID |
Delete a document from a SiYuan notebook by providing the notebook ID and document path.
按路径删除文档
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | 文档路径 | |
| notebook | Yes | 思源块、文档、笔记本或数据库 ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true. Description adds the specific deletion method but does not disclose side effects, permanence, or required permissions beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single phrase, front-loaded with key information. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 2-parameter destructive tool with full annotation coverage and no output schema, the description is sufficient. Could include more context about when to use it over the similarly purposed 'remove_doc_by_id'.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes both parameters. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what is in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb '删除' (delete) and resource '文档' (document) with the method '按路径' (by path), distinguishing it from sibling 'remove_doc_by_id'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'remove_doc_by_id', nor any prerequisites or exclusions. Only states what it does.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/xgq18237/siyuan_mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server