pandoc_convert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false and the description adds no behavioral context. It does not disclose side effects, authorization needs, or whether the tool modifies state beyond the conversion itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence is concise but under-specifies the tool. It is front-loaded but lacks necessary detail, making it insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description should address return values and side effects. It does not, leaving the agent without key information needed to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to compensate. However, it adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; for instance, it does not explain the format of 'dir' or the expected structure of 'args'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it executes a Pandoc conversion, which identifies the verb and resource. However, it lacks specificity about what content is converted (files, blocks, etc.), and does not distinguish it clearly from sibling tools related to blocks or documents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any preconditions, contexts, or when it should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.