generate_context_summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'generate a summary' with no mention of side effects, permissions, or response format. This is insufficient for a tool that may read sensitive project state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and a simple input, but the description does not clarify what the summary includes (e.g., recent changes, key issues). Given siblings like 'get_project_state' and 'generate_report', more detail is needed to avoid confusion.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'agentName' is already described in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline of 3 applies; no enhancement needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a summary of project context, which is a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'generate_report' or 'get_project_state', leaving ambiguity about the summary's scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools for information retrieval, the description should indicate when a context summary is appropriate, e.g., for an overview vs detailed reporting.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.