Skip to main content
Glama
wyn0001

AI Collaboration MCP Server

by wyn0001

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Collaboration MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Transforms Claude into an autonomous development team with architect, agent, and QA roles, enabling automated sprint execution, task management, and continuous learning.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to collaborate with Gemini for code reviews, second opinions, and iterative software development. It facilitates multi-step workflows including PRD creation and code generation through an AI orchestration framework.
      2
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables collaboration between multiple AI models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) to work together on complex tasks, with intelligent task distribution and role-based expert assignment for code development, review, and optimization.
      18
      7 npm
      49
      MIT
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code as a team leader to delegate tasks to GPT and Gemini experts, supporting multi-LLM collaboration with tools for consultation, code review, design, and background execution.
      76
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects multiple AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, Grok, etc.) into a coordinated, auditable team with shared memory, task ownership, and human oversight, enabling parallel collaboration without conflicts.
      238
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes but there is some overlap between create_mission, create_project_plan, and send_directive for task creation. Also, ask_question/answer_question are clear pairs. Overall, an agent can distinguish, but minor ambiguity exists.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a mostly consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_mission, get_project_state). However, a few tools like 'ping', 'status', and 'init' lack a noun after the verb, deviating from the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    28 tools is slightly high but reasonable for a collaboration server covering missions, projects, tasks, tickets, autonomous loops, and reporting. The scope justifies the count, though some consolidation could help.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover core lifecycle operations for projects and tickets but are missing delete operations for missions, tasks, and tickets. Also, no explicit update_task tool exists. This leaves some gaps that agents may need to work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues