Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cometbft-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Read-only MCP server that monitors a Bitcoin Core full node via JSON-RPC, providing tools to check node status, network info, mempool, and peer information.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server providing on-chain monitoring reads such as ENS expiry, gas prices, token unlocks, and oracle health via the FabTally Chain API. It supports stdio and streamable-http transports, is read-only and keyless, with pay-per-call tools.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server for safely exploring Nostr, enabling agents to resolve identifiers, fetch profiles and events, query notes, and inspect relay metadata. It does not accept private keys or publish events.
    5
    12 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct diagnostic axis (consensus round, node sync, peers, validator signing, upgrades), and descriptions include explicit cross-references such as 'does NOT check peers (use peer_health)'. The only real overlap is fleet_overview, which aggregates the same signals as the four single-purpose tools, but the 'sweep first, then drill in' framing makes the boundary workable.

Naming Consistency5/5

All six names follow the same noun_noun convention (resource + aspect of health: node_status, peer_health, validator_health, upgrade_readiness, consensus_diagnosis, fleet_overview). No mixing of verb styles, casing, or languages.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is tightly scoped for a CometBFT diagnostics server: one aggregate sweep plus five focused probes covering consensus, sync, p2p, signing, and upgrades. Every tool maps to a distinct failure mode an operator would investigate.

Completeness4/5

The diagnostic surface covers the main halt/liveness causes (quorum, sync, isolation, jailing, upgrade) plus a fleet-wide aggregate, which is strong for a read-only diagnosis domain. Minor gaps: no mempool/tx-layer inspection and no historical or trend view of past incidents, though these are arguably out of scope.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessSyncing