Skip to main content
Glama
wolfsidevstudios

LayoutPilot MCP Server

Official
by wolfsidevstudios
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to LayoutPilot MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • UI HUB MCP Server

      jainil224
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to search, discover, and retrieve UI HUB components, source code, dependencies, templates, and animations via MCP.
      -

    • mendix-mcp-server

      dhanavel-013
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and modify Mendix application models through MCP tools for creating modules, entities, pages, microflows, deploying, and querying runtime data.
      1
      -

    • Loometo

      dinimiciuillabs-cloud
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to visually build and run AI generation pipelines on a canvas by adding, wiring, and executing nodes via MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    generate_ui and generate_component are reasonably distinct (full layout vs. single component), but open_layoutpilot overlaps significantly with both since it also accepts a prompt and opens the same tool. An agent could easily select open_layoutpilot when it intends a specific generation mode.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All three tools use snake_case with a clear 'generate_' and 'open_' verb prefix followed by a noun, maintaining a consistent verb_noun pattern. Minor deviation is that open_layoutpilot uses the tool name as the object while the others use the output type.

    Tool Count3/5

    Three tools is on the low end but appropriate for a thin wrapper that primarily generates URLs to an external service. It feels slightly thin since there are no supporting operations, but the scope is intentionally narrow.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools only cover generation (full layout and component) plus a general open. There are notable gaps: no update, preview, iterate on existing layouts, manage versions, or retrieve generated results. Agents have no way to act on output beyond following a URL, creating dead ends for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources