cf_list_warp_devices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description must bear the burden. It discloses GET method and auto-pagination, which is useful. However, it omits authorization needs, rate limits, or data freshness; minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with two sentences, front-loaded with purpose and API reference. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description lacks parameter explanations and usage guidelines. With 2 parameters and 0% schema coverage, the description is incomplete for an agent to use effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage and the description does not explain any parameters. account_id and max_pages are not described; an agent cannot infer their meaning or usage from the tool definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool lists WARP-enrolled devices, and differentiates from sibling cf_get_warp_device by indicating plural listing vs singular retrieval. Also specifies the API endpoint and auto-pagination.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like cf_get_warp_device or other list tools. The description implies usage by stating it lists devices, but lacks context about prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.