cf_get_logpush_job

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the HTTP method (GET) and return content (configuration + last delivery status), which implies a read operation. However, it does not explicitly state that it is read-only or discuss prerequisites, rate limits, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one sentence for purpose, followed by a clear Arg list and an HTTP path. No unnecessary words, and the primary purpose is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations but the presence of an output schema, the description is fairly complete. It covers the parameters, the HTTP path, and the return values (config + delivery status). It lacks explicit mention that this is a read operation, but the GET method strongly implies it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description provides detailed explanations for all three parameters: scope values ('zone' or 'account'), scope_id matching the scope, and job_id format (integer-as-string). This adds significant meaning beyond the schema's type and title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool 'Get a single Logpush job's configuration + last delivery status.' The verb 'Get' and resource 'Logpush job' are specific, and it distinguishes itself from sibling cf_list_logpush_jobs by indicating it retrieves a single job.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates use for a specific job via job_id, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus the listing sibling cf_list_logpush_jobs. No exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.