Mini+ Agent Kit MCP Server
Stores artifact data (e.g., images) as IPFS CIDs for content-addressed storage of work proofs.
Anchors Verifiable Robotic Work proofs on-chain via a sidecar, enabling reputation and feedback on the Solana blockchain.
Allows driving the robot via Telegram chat, with commands mapped to robot verbs and inline image responses.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Mini+ Agent Kit MCP ServerExplore the room and capture work as proof."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Mini+ Agent Kit
Drive a BitRobot-compatible ground robot with Claude — an Earth Rover Mini+ or a Waveshare UGV — and turn its runs into Verifiable Robotic Work on-chain.
It's built on the three real specs in the BitRobot ecosystem, not bespoke glue:
Layer | Conforms to | This kit |
Robot | LeRobot robot interface ( |
|
Agent | openClaw branch — instruction files + safe high-level verbs |
|
Work | BitRobot subnet API — Verifiable Robotic Work ( |
|
Architecture
📐 Full system architecture with 13 validated diagrams, control equations, and the capability matrix: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
instruction files (AGENTS/SOUL/IDENTITY/TOOLS) ── compose ──► system prompt
│
Claude (Opus 4.8) ──► openClaw VERBS (tools) ─────────────────────────────► RoverVerbs
status_report · look · photo · move · turn · obstacle_check · track_color · │ │
autonav · navigate · checkpoint_reached · speak · set_lamp · camera_move · │ │
capture_work · finish │ │
┌───────────────┘ └───────────────┐
EarthRoverVerbs HarnessVerbs
(delegates to openClaw (closed-loop turn via yaw,
server /turn /track-color…) lidar obstacle_check…)
│ │
EarthRoverClient HarnessClient
(FrodoBots SDK) (robot-harness, Waveshare)
capture_work ─► store_artifact (Walrus URL + IPFS CID + sha256) ─► WorkSink
├─ BitRobotSink → /subnets/{id}/events (VRW → Bolts)
└─ OnchainRoverSink → sidecar /proof → settle.ts (Arc/Solana)One agent, two robots (swap the client), one artifact, two ledgers.
flowchart TB
subgraph FE["Front-ends (clients)"]
AG["MiniPlusAgent<br/>Claude tool-use loop"]
CH["RoverChat / TelegramBridge"]
MC["MCP server<br/>any MCP client"]
end
subgraph CORE["Verb core — single source of truth"]
REG["VERBS registry<br/>name · cap · schema · handler"]
MT["make_tools(caps, has_work)"]
DP["dispatch(verbs, name, args)"]
REG --> MT
REG --> DP
end
subgraph VB["RoverVerbs — openClaw verb surface"]
ER["EarthRoverVerbs"]
HV["HarnessVerbs"]
end
subgraph TR["Transports"]
EC["EarthRoverClient<br/>FrodoBots SDK"]
HC["HarnessClient<br/>robot-harness"]
end
subgraph WK["Work layer"]
WS["WorkSink"]
BR["BitRobotSink"]
OR["OnchainRoverSink (Arc)"]
SR["SolanaRoverSink (clanker5000)"]
RP["RaceProofSink"]
WS --- BR
WS --- OR
WS --- SR
WS --- RP
end
AG --> MT
CH --> MT
MC --> MT
AG --> DP
CH --> DP
MC --> DP
DP --> ER
DP --> HV
ER --> EC --> MINI["EarthRover Mini+"]
HV --> HC --> UGV["Waveshare UGV"]
DP -. capture_work .-> WSGPS waypoint navigation (Earth Rover Challenge — Urban track):
flowchart TD
S["goto_checkpoint()"] --> N["navigate(): GPS + heading,<br/>next un-scanned checkpoint"]
N --> D{all checkpoints<br/>scanned?}
D -- yes --> OK["mission complete"]
D -- no --> T{distance ≤ 15 m?}
T -- yes --> CR["checkpoint_reached()"]
CR --> N
T -- no --> H{abs heading_error<br/>> 18°?}
H -- yes --> TU["turn(heading_error)"]
H -- no --> MV["move(forward)"]
TU --> N
MV --> NVerifiable Robotic Work — one content-addressed artifact, multiple ledgers:
flowchart TB
CAP["capture_work / submit_work"] --> ART["store_artifact:<br/>Walrus blobId + IPFS CIDv1 + sha256"]
ART --> MS["MultiSink (one artifact, many ledgers)"]
MS --> BR["BitRobotSink"]
MS --> OR["OnchainRoverSink"]
MS --> SR["SolanaRoverSink"]
MS --> RP["RaceProofSink"]
BR --> E1["POST /subnets/{id}/events<br/>VRW points → Bolts"]
OR --> E2["POST /proof + /give-feedback<br/>ReputationRegistry → Arc (Clanker 500)"]
SR --> E4["POST /proof + /give-feedback<br/>clanker5000.give_feedback → Solana (Clanker 5000)"]
RP --> E3["POST /race/settle<br/>settle.settleRaceOnChain → Arc"]More figures (agent loop, kinematics, visual servo, VRW lifecycle, Waveshare command stack, module graph, end-to-end, tests) in docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
Related MCP server: Robotics MCP Server
Why verbs, not raw control
The openClaw kit's key lesson: an agent should drive through safe, high-level
verbs, never raw /control. So turn uses heading feedback (and is the only
way to rotate), move is distance-calibrated and aborts on a blocked path,
status_report returns real sensors (never fabricated), and track_color /
autonav hand off to purpose-built loops — exactly the two flagship demos
("send stats via chat", "find and follow the yellow card"). The agent's behavior
comes from editable markdown in instructions/.
Install
pip install -e . # core
pip install -e ".[mcp]" # + expose the rover as an MCP server
pip install -e ".[track]" # + Waveshare client-side track_color (Pillow+numpy)
pip install -e ".[lerobot]" # + Waveshare LeRobot backend (datasets/policies)
pip install -e ".[vision]" # + Gemini scene captions for the harness
cp .env.example .env # fill in keysYou also need a robot backend running:
Earth Rover: the Earth Rovers SDK (
feature/openClaw) —hypercorn main:app(:8000)Waveshare: your
robot-harness(or the sidecar adapter) (:8000)
Quick start — Claude drives, work goes on-chain
from mini_plus_agent_kit import HarnessClient, MiniPlusAgent, BitRobotSink, OnchainRoverSink, MultiSink
rover = HarnessClient("http://localhost:8000", speed_mode="medium") # Waveshare
work = MultiSink(BitRobotSink(), OnchainRoverSink()) # VRW + your settle
agent = MiniPlusAgent(rover, work=work, resource_name="ugv_001", on_event=print)
result = agent.run(
"Explore the room, find the package, capture_work it as proof, then finish. "
"Check obstacles before moving forward."
)Swap HarnessClient(...) for EarthRoverClient(...) and the same agent drives an
Earth Rover Mini+ (gaining speak and a server-side blocking turn). The toolset
auto-adapts to each backend's verb capabilities. track_color ("follow the yellow
card") works on both — server-side on the Earth Rover, and as a client-side HSV
visual-servo loop on the Waveshare ([track] extra: Pillow+numpy).
Drive from any MCP client (the elegant core)
The bundled agent and Telegram bridge are conveniences — the standard way to drive the rover is as an MCP server. Point any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, the Agent SDK) at it and the verbs become its tools — no kit-specific agent loop:
mpak mcp --backend waveshare # stdio MCP server (verbs as tools)// Claude Desktop / Code config
{ "mcpServers": { "rover": { "command": "mpak", "args": ["mcp", "--backend", "waveshare"] } } }Crucially this isn't a fourth code path: the MCP tool list is make_tools(...) and
each call routes through dispatch(...) — the same single source of truth the
Claude agent and the Telegram chat use. One verb definition, three front-ends
(agent / chat / MCP), every robot backend.
CLI
mpak mission "Find and follow the yellow card." --backend earthrover --bitrobot
mpak mission "Patrol and flag obstacles." --backend waveshare --onchain --bitrobot
mpak telegram --backend waveshare # chat-drive the rover (openClaw demo)
mpak register ugv_001 --backend waveshare --owner <SOL> # BitRobot Entity NFT
mpak mcp --backend waveshare # serve as an MCP server (see above)
mpak sim # run the nav stack in the simulator — no hardware (see below)
mpak status # telemetry + mission state
mpak checkpoints # list mission checkpoints (Earth Rover)
mpak shot --map -o frames/ # save camera frames
mpak speak "hello" # text-to-speech (Earth Rover)
mpak teleop # manual keyboard drivingSimulate without a robot (mpak sim)
mpak sim drives the real NavController through the unified RoverSim
(sim.py) — the same closed-loop nav stack as on hardware, but with simulated
GPS/IMU/odometry instead of a wired robot. It needs no backend, no keys, and no
network: a quick way to watch the rover converge on a checkpoint (or run a small
domain-randomized sweep) on any laptop before pointing the kit at a real rover.
mpak sim # one run to a checkpoint, printing convergenceChat surface (Telegram — the openClaw flagship demo)
RoverChat is a conversational agent over the same verbs; TelegramBridge
long-polls the Bot API and pipes messages through it, replying with text and
inline camera frames.
from mini_plus_agent_kit import HarnessClient, TelegramBridge
bridge = TelegramBridge(HarnessClient("http://localhost:8000"),
token="<TELEGRAM_BOT_TOKEN>")
bridge.run_forever() # "what's your status?" → status_report; "look" → photo inlineOr just mpak telegram --backend waveshare (reads TELEGRAM_BOT_TOKEN +
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY). Add --bitrobot/--onchain to record VRW from chat-driven runs.
Verifiable Robotic Work
capture_work (or submit_work) stores the frame once and runs the task
lifecycle on whichever sink(s) you configured:
from mini_plus_agent_kit import submit_work, BitRobotSink
rec = submit_work(BitRobotSink(), open("clip.jpg","rb").read(),
label="delivery @ door", vrw_points=120, resource_name="frodobot_001")
print(rec.artifact.ipfs_cid, rec.artifact.walrus_url)BitRobotSink→register_resource→task_start→task_end {raw_data_uri, raw_data_cid}→task_validate {vrw_points}(Subnet Points → Bolts; Entity NFT on Solana).raw_data_uriis the Walrus URL;raw_data_cidis computed (cid_v1_rawfor ≤1 MiB, theipfsCLI for larger).OnchainRoverSink(Arc / EVM — Clanker 500) →task_endposts/proof {blobId, sha256, label}(the tracker);task_validateposts/give-feedback {robot, skill, score, blobId, sha256}, which your sidecar anchors on Arc viasettle.giveFeedback→ReputationRegistry.giveFeedback. The robot's on-chainagentIdis resolved sidecar-side; key custody stays in the sidecar.OnchainRoverSink(robot="guard", skill="deliver", score=None, anchor=True)— VRW points map to the 0–100 reputation score unless you pass an explicitscore; setanchor=Falseto register the proof without the chain write. (The kit sends the bare hex sha256 sincegiveFeedbackre-adds0x.)SolanaRoverSink(Solana — Clanker 5000) → the same/proof+/give-feedbacksurface, but the native-Solana sidecar (port 4021) anchors it on theclanker5000Anchor program:give_feedbackwrites a per-agent reputation PDA carryingfeedback_uri = walrus://blobIdandfeedback_hash = sha256(32 bytes). A score≥ 70clears the program'sATTESTATION_THRESHOLD; the call returns a Solana signature surfaced with anexplorer.solana.comlink and averifiedflag.SolanaRoverSink(robot="guard", skill="deliver", cluster="devnet"). Register the agent once via the sidecar's/register-agent→clanker5000.register_agent. One robot run can anchor on both ledgers at once viaMultiSink(BitRobotSink(...), SolanaRoverSink(...)).RaceProofSink(winner_idx=..., race_id=None)→task_validateposts/race/settle {raceId, winnerIdx, sha256, blobId}→settle.settleRaceOnChain→RaceMarket.settle(judge = guard). Use when the agent is the race oracle and its captured finish frame should settle the parimutuel market (unlike/race/finish, which re-captures the guard's own photo). Needs the smallPOST /race/settleroute added to the sidecar (mirrors/give-feedback).race_id=Nonelets the sidecar use its currentonChainRaceId.
Register a robot as an Entity NFT (earn VRW under its own resource)
mpak register ugv_001 --backend waveshare --owner <SOLANA_WALLET> --symbol UGVfrom mini_plus_agent_kit import BitRobotSink
sink = BitRobotSink(resource_subtype="waveshare_ugv", resource_name="ugv_001", owner="<sol>")
sink.register(symbol="UGV", description="Waveshare UGV", image="https://…/ugv.png")
# every subsequent submit_work/capture_work on `sink` attributes VRW to ugv_001BitRobotSink carries resource_name/resource_subtype defaults so all work auto-attributes to the registered Entity NFT (Waveshare → waveshare_ugv, Earth Rover → frodobot).
Earth Rover Challenge (Urban track) — Claude as a navigation policy
The Earth Rover Challenge (IROS 2026) runs off-board policies that take the rover's camera + GPS and drive to mission checkpoints within a 15 m tolerance, scored by difficulty × completion time — pitting autonomous policies against human teleoperators (current AI ceiling ~57%). This kit is a challenge-ready off-board policy (it speaks the same Remote Access SDK), with real GPS waypoint navigation:
navigate— great-circle distance, bearing, and signed turn to the next checkpoint from live GPS + heading (geo.py: haversine + initial bearing + heading error; verified against the Berkeley→Stanford route).checkpoint_reached— claim arrival within tolerance.EarthRoverVerbs.goto_checkpoint()— a deterministic turn-to-bearing + creep controller (the autonomous baseline), or let Claude drive vianavigate+look+move/turn(the VLM-agent baseline — vision handles obstacles GPS can't see). Seeexamples/earth_rover_challenge.py.EarthRoverVerbs.goto_checkpoint_fused()— the closed-loop navigation stack (estimator.py+control.py): a PI complementary heading filter with online gyro-bias estimation (a 1-axis Mahony filter), a Kalman pose filter (covariance-weighted GPS fusion + Mahalanobis outlier gating), pure-pursuit steering, and a safety envelope (battery / tilt / lidar time-to-collision), composed behindNavController.step(telemetry) → twist. In a noisy A/B sim with GPS multipath spikes, the bang-bang baseline false-arrives 34.6 m from the checkpoint (a miss at 15 m tolerance) while the fused stack gates every outlier, truly arrives (14.9 m), and tracks heading 2.2× better than the raw magnetometer. See §7.1 of the architecture spec.EarthRoverVerbs.goto_checkpoint_planned(costmap)— the global+local split (Nav2-style): A* over an inflated occupancyCostmap(planner.py) finds a path around obstacles, tracked by regulated pure pursuit (velocity-scaled lookahead + curvature/approach speed regulation). A straight-line seeker drives into anything between it and the goal; in the sim it ploughs through a building for 46 ticks while the planned route reaches the checkpoint with 0 incursions. See §7.2.NavController(use_dwa=True)— a Dynamic Window Approach local planner (control.py): samples the reachable(v, ω)window, rolls each candidate out, discards colliding trajectories, and scores goal/clearance/speed to steer around a moving obstacle (the reactive layer beneath the global plan). In the sim a pedestrian crosses the corridor: plain pursuit closes to 0.16 m (collision) while DWA holds 2.87 m clearance and still reaches the goal. See §7.3.Estimator refinements (§7.4): speed-gated GPS-course fusion (down-weights a magnetically-disturbed compass — cuts heading RMSE 24.9° → 10.4° under a 25° hard-iron bias), magnetometer hard/soft-iron calibration (
MagnetometerCalibrator, ellipsoid → sphere), and a full 2×2 covariance pose filter with anisotropic process noise + GPS-latency rewind, and a full-ellipsoid soft-iron calibration (fit_ellipsoid, numpy) that recovers heading to ~0° on a rotated ellipsoid (vs 16.7° for diagonal).Domain-randomized validation (
sim.py): a unifiedRoverSimwith a fully parameterizedSensorModeldrives the realNavController; a Monte-Carlo over 150 randomized worlds (GPS/IMU/odometry error drawn per trial) reaches the checkpoint within tolerance 99.3% of the time — robustness across an error envelope, not one tuned point. See §7.5.
The live tests drive a 2D kinematic rover sim over real HTTP to a GPS checkpoint
(tests/live/test_live_navigate.py), run the fused-vs-baseline A/B under sensor
noise + GPS multipath (tests/live/test_live_navstack.py), rescue a biased
magnetometer with GPS-course fusion (tests/live/test_live_heading.py), route around
an obstacle with A* + regulated pursuit (tests/live/test_live_planner.py), and
dodge a moving pedestrian with DWA (tests/live/test_live_dwa.py).
Waveshare as a LeRobot robot
lerobot-record --robot.type=waveshare_ugv --teleop.type=keyboard_rover \
--dataset.repo_id=you/ugv-nav --dataset.single_task="Navigate"WaveshareUGV presents the Mini+ action/observation schema (plus lidar) so
datasets and policies are cross-compatible with the upstream EarthRover Mini+.
Layout
mini_plus_agent_kit/
client.py EarthRoverClient — FrodoBots SDK transport (+ openClaw verbs)
harness_client.py HarnessClient — Waveshare robot-harness transport
rover.py RoverVerbs — openClaw verb surface (2 backends)
estimator.py HeadingFilter/PoseFilter/MagnetometerCalibrator — heading+pose fusion, mag cal
control.py NavController — pursuit + RPP + DWA + PID + safety stack
planner.py Costmap + A* — global path planning around obstacles
sim.py RoverSim + SensorModel — unified simulator for domain-randomized MC
work.py WorkSink — BitRobot VRW + onchain-rover, artifacts, IPFS CID
agent.py MiniPlusAgent — Claude loop + run manifest + safety supervisor/watchdog
observability.py Run — structured event log + JSON run manifest
safety.py SafetySupervisor/Watchdog — mission budgets + deadman emergency-stop
tools.py verb tools + dispatch
telegram.py RoverChat + TelegramBridge — chat surface (openClaw demo)
mcp_server.py MCP server over the same make_tools()+dispatch() core
lerobot_backend.py WaveshareUGV — LeRobot robot (optional)
instructions/ AGENTS/SOUL/IDENTITY/TOOLS.md
cli.py mpakTests
A hermetic suite (no robot, no network, no real SDKs — httpx/anthropic are
stubbed) covers kinematics, telemetry mapping, IPFS CID, capability-filtered
tools, the openClaw verb→endpoint wiring, the navigation stack (filters,
controllers, safety, costmap + A* planner, closed-loop sim scenarios), all three
work sinks, and a full scripted agent-loop run:
python3 tests/run_all.py # zero-dependency runner (exits non-zero on failure)
pytest tests/ # also works (conftest applies the same stubs)And a live suite using real libraries and real I/O — no stubs (a local HTTP server emulates the harness; Walrus is a public testnet; no robot or keys needed):
bash tests/live/run_live.sh # installs real deps (httpx, mcp, Pillow, numpy) into .venv, then runs:
# • real HarnessClient/HarnessVerbs over real sockets (twist→diff on the wire,
# telemetry/lidar, JPEG bytes, closed-loop turn, /light, /camera/move mapping)
# • the real MCP server: real protocol (initialize→list_tools→call_tool)→dispatch→HTTP
# • real track_color: HSV blob detection + visual-servo steering on generated frames
# • real GPS navigate: the goto_checkpoint controller reaches a checkpoint in a sim
# • navstack A/B: fused NavController (Kalman + Mahalanobis gating) truly arrives and rejects
# GPS multipath where the bang-bang baseline false-arrives 34.6 m out
# • heading: speed-gated GPS-course fusion rescues a 25°-biased magnetometer (24.9°→10.4°)
# • planner: A* over a costmap + regulated pure pursuit routes around a building (0 incursions)
# • dwa: dynamic-window local planner steers around a moving pedestrian (holds clearance, arrives)
# • montecarlo: real NavController over 150 domain-randomized worlds → 99.3% true-arrival
# • ellipsoid: full hard+soft-iron mag calibration recovers heading on a rotated ellipsoid
# • solana: real httpx → emulated clanker5000 sidecar (give_feedback signature + explorer)
# • real Walrus testnet store + byte-identical retrieve + IPFS CIDv1Observability & mission safety
Every mission produces an auditable run manifest (observability.Run) — a
structured event timeline (objective → verb → artifact CID/sha → on-chain tx →
safety events) + counters/timers, attached to RunResult.manifest (save with
MPAK_MANIFEST_PATH; live stream with MPAK_LOG_LEVEL=INFO). Two safety layers wrap
the loop beyond the per-command SafetyEnvelope: a SafetySupervisor enforcing
mission budgets (runtime, cumulative distance, geofence, battery — latching on
breach), and a deadman Watchdog thread that emergency-stops the robot if a turn
hangs (e.g. a blocked LLM call) and the loop stops petting it. Configure via
MiniPlusAgent(..., limits=MissionLimits(...), watchdog_timeout_s=120).
Safety
turn uses heading feedback; move aborts on a lidar-blocked path; the agent is
prompted to avoid people/traffic/ledges and to obstacle_check before advancing;
the loop stops the robot on exit and on any verb error. This is research/hobbyist
tooling — keep a human in the loop.
Sources
MIT.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xSoftBoi/mini-plus-agent-kit'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server