Connect to a remote COMSOL Multiphysics server by specifying host and port, enabling AI-driven automation of multiphysics simulations.
Connect to a remote COMSOL server.
Args: port: Port number the COMSOL server is listening on host: Server hostname or IP address (default: 'localhost')
Returns: Connection info or error message
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| host | No | localhost | |
| port | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It states connection and return of info/error, but lacks details on side effects, session management, blocking behavior, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and front-loaded with the purpose. The docstring format with Args/Returns is efficient, and every sentence adds value without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the return description is adequate but minimal. Missing context about prerequisites (e.g., server must be running) and relation to sibling tools. Could note that this is typically used before other COMSOL operations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds meaning by explaining 'port' and 'host' (including default). This compensates for the missing schema descriptions, though port range or format could be more specific.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Connect') and the resource ('remote COMSOL server'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'comsol_disconnect' and 'comsol_start'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor prerequisites like server availability. The implied usage is to connect before other operations, but no exclusions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.