Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
analyze_stockA

Free fundamental analysis of a publicly traded stock. Scores the company against Stoxly's 10-point checklist (P/E, PEG, price/book, revenue growth, ROE, operating margin, return on assets, quick ratio, debt/equity, free cash flow yield) and returns the score, a descriptive verdict, every metric value and a link to the full analysis page. null means a metric was unavailable — never treat it as 0.

analyze_etfA

Free analysis of a US-listed ETF. Scores the fund against Stoxly's 10-point checklist (expense ratio, fund size, fund age, number of holdings, top-10 weight, top sector weight, volatility, 1/3/5-year returns) and returns the score, a descriptive verdict, every metric value and a link to the full analysis page. Fund stats are usually only available for US-listed ETFs.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools target mutually exclusive asset types (single stock vs US-listed ETF), and each description explicitly names its own checklist, so there is no realistic chance of misselection. Their inputs, outputs, and caveats (null metrics, US-listing requirement) are clearly scoped to one instrument class each.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both names follow the identical verb_noun snake_case pattern (analyze_stock, analyze_etf), with the noun mapping cleanly onto the asset class being analyzed. Fully predictable and extensible.

Tool Count3/5

Two tools is thin for a server framed around stock/ETF research, even if the scope is deliberately narrow and each tool is substantial. It is borderline rather than wrong, but leaves no room for lookups, comparisons, or screener-style operations.

Completeness3/5

Coverage of the two core analysis operations is solid and symmetric, and each returns a pointer to a fuller page. However, there is no discovery or lookup surface (e.g. resolving a ticker/company name, searching or listing available instruments) and no comparison or batch analysis, so an agent that does not already know a valid symbol hits a dead end.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues