Stoxly
Related Servers
Alternatives to Stoxly
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the AKKA Finance DEX aggregator — swap quotes, routes, and execution across EVM chains.947 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Yahoo Finance data through tools for searching instruments, fetching quotes, history, company info, financials, dividends, news, recommendations, and options. Enables AI assistants to answer market-data questions using natural language.22MIT
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides financial stock analysis for U.S. public companies via SEC EDGAR APIs, offering tools to resolve companies, retrieve filings, calculate profitability metrics, compare periods, detect red flags, and get audit evidence, all without API keys.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides TradingView-style market analysis with OHLCV candles, 19 technical indicators, a screener, and a backtester using public Yahoo Finance data without API keys.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAgent-ready financial intelligence tools for AI agents. Two curated tools — get_stock_snapshot and get_company_metrics — that combine multiple data sources, derive signals (UNDERVALUED, STRONG, ACCELERATING), and pre-compute the math. One call, one agent-friendly response.348 npm1MIT
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables LLMs to retrieve, analyze, and visualize stock prices and financial report data for quantitative trading research and investment analysis. Provides real-time and historical stock data, financial statement analysis, key metric calculations, and trading signal visualization.13-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to fetch real-time stock fundamentals, news, price history, and perform screener searches using Finviz and Yahoo Finance data without API keys. Note: screener functionality works only locally due to IP restrictions.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides yfinance-based quant tools for stock price lookups, fundamentals, metric comparisons, price history statistics, and earnings dates, enabling natural-language stock questions.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools target mutually exclusive asset types (single stock vs US-listed ETF), and each description explicitly names its own checklist, so there is no realistic chance of misselection. Their inputs, outputs, and caveats (null metrics, US-listing requirement) are clearly scoped to one instrument class each.
Both names follow the identical verb_noun snake_case pattern (analyze_stock, analyze_etf), with the noun mapping cleanly onto the asset class being analyzed. Fully predictable and extensible.
Two tools is thin for a server framed around stock/ETF research, even if the scope is deliberately narrow and each tool is substantial. It is borderline rather than wrong, but leaves no room for lookups, comparisons, or screener-style operations.
Coverage of the two core analysis operations is solid and symmetric, and each returns a pointer to a fuller page. However, there is no discovery or lookup surface (e.g. resolving a ticker/company name, searching or listing available instruments) and no comparison or batch analysis, so an agent that does not already know a valid symbol hits a dead end.