Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to writ-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Least-privilege compiler and MCP gateway for AI agents: run your agent in record-only mode, compile the smallest policy it actually needs from its real tool calls, enforce it at the gateway (deny > approve > allow), and keep a SHA-256 hash-chained audit of every call that verifies offline.
      14
      179 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A governance proxy for AI tools — every MCP/agent tool call is policy-gated, secret-redacted, and written to a hash-chained, offline-verifiable audit trail.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI agent identity, permissions, trust scores, and tamper-evident audit trails. 17 MCP tools: register agents (Ed25519 keypairs), check permissions (sub-5ms), emit audit events, verify trust scores (0-100), delegate credentials, ephemeral agents. IETF Internet-Draft filed. Works with LangChain, OpenAI, CrewAI, Stripe ACP. npx @vorim/mcp-server
      17
      257 npm
      66
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gates every AI agent tool call against your policy before it runs, then writes a hash-chained, tamper-evident record of what was decided and what happened. Anyone can verify that record offline, without your software, your systems or any key you hold.
      2,554 PyPI
      13
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Commit-time audit engine for AI coding agents. Scans git diffs with 24 audit rules, writes HMAC-signed tamper-evident audit history, and ships MCP tools for governance aggregation.
      104
      51
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the authorization lifecycle: check, verify token, grant, revoke, reinstate, receipts, policy, and sandbox. Descriptions clearly separate the stages, especially writ_check vs writ_verify_token and writ_grant vs writ_sandbox.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the writ_ prefix with snake_case and descriptive verb or noun suffixes, forming a predictable and consistent pattern across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is well-scoped for an authorization and audit server, covering the core actions without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core check-grant-verify-revoke lifecycle plus audit receipts and policy read. A minor gap is the absence of a tool to update policy or manage tenant settings via MCP, but covered workflows can proceed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive