Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tba

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides access to the Statbotics API for FIRST Robotics Competition statistical data and predictions. Enables AI assistants and other MCP clients to retrieve FRC team EPA ratings, event predictions, and match analytics.
    14
    62 npm
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Python MCP server that provides comprehensive access to MLB statistics and baseball data through a FastAPI-based interface. Acts as a bridge between AI applications and MLB data sources, enabling seamless integration of baseball statistics, game information, player data, and more.
    24
    59
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP Server that enables interaction with MLB scores and statistics via the SportsData.io MLB V3 Scores API, allowing users to access baseball data through natural language queries.
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for accessing college basketball statistics through the SportsData.io CBB v3 Stats API, enabling AI agents to retrieve and analyze college basketball data through natural language interactions.
    -
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for reading, writing, and monitoring FRC NetworkTables data, enabling AI agents to interact with a robot's NetworkTables over the NetworkTables protocol.
    18
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides access to ESPN Fantasy Basketball APIs, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to fetch league teams, rosters, free agents, matchups, NBA schedules, and live draft assistant tools.
    14
    2
    MIT

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 61 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The full/simple/keys variants are consistently documented, so most tools are clearly separated by payload depth and scope. However, the set is large enough that some boundaries are fuzzy—notably get_team_media vs get_team_social_media and get_team_history vs the various _all aggregates—so an agent must read descriptions carefully to avoid misselection.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows the get_<resource>[_scope][_simple|_keys] convention, with uniform use of suffixes to indicate payload size and modifiers like _all, _by_year, and _event. The naming is highly predictable and consistent across all 61 tools.

Tool Count2/5

61 tools is a very large surface for an agent to navigate, and most simple/keys variants could have been collapsed into optional result-shaping parameters. While the FRC domain is broad, this count falls well into the too-many range and will slow down tool discovery and selection.

Completeness5/5

The read-only FRC domain is covered extremely thoroughly: teams, events, matches, districts, awards, media, rankings, OPR, predictions, statuses, and even robot telemetry all have dedicated tools. There are no obvious dead ends for scouting, research, or live event analysis workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues