Skip to main content
Glama
withgardener

Universal Web Retrieval MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Universal Web Retrieval MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web search, extraction, and research across multiple provider backends with persistent multi-key rotation and auditable routing. Supports MCP, CLI, and Agent Skill entry points.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run unified web searches across multiple providers such as Exa, Serper, Tavily, Firecrawl, and Jina, fusing results with reciprocal rank fusion, and to extract readable content from public web pages, PDFs, and video pages as Markdown. Provider chains are configurable, failures are isolated per provider, and responses report attempted, succeeded, failed, and skipped channels with source tracing and honest warnings.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables keyless multi-engine web, news, image, and video metasearch plus full-page markdown extraction for AI agents over MCP, with resilient fallback across DuckDuckGo, Bing, Brave, Google, and other backends.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches and extract full-text content from web pages via standard MCP tools, with fallback search and semantic reranking.
      2
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run local web searches with automatic failover across multiple search providers and to extract public web pages as titles and Markdown content, using circuit breaking and key-redacted logging.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    web_fetch retrieves content from a known URL, while web_search discovers URLs via a query. Their purposes are clearly distinct with no overlapping behavior.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same snake_case 'web_<verb>' pattern, making the set predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools are provided; while they are core, the set feels thin for a server named 'Universal Web Retrieval' and lacks depth beyond basic search and fetch.

    Completeness4/5

    The core read path (search + fetch) is covered, including batch fetch up to 5 URLs. Minor gaps remain around pagination, crawling, or advanced search filters, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues